Davis v. King et al

Filing 5

ORDER DIRECTING STATE TO RESPOND; Jim Hood answer due 1/20/2020; Ronald King answer due 1/20/2020., GRANTING #3 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Elbert Davis.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy Percy on 11/6/19. (jla)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI GREENVILLE DIVISION ELBERT DAVIS PETITIONER V. NO. 4:19-CV-00161-DMB-RP RONALD KING, and ATTORNEY GENERAL JIM HOOD RESPONDENTS ORDER Elbert Davis has filed a petition for relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 and seeks to proceed in forma pauperis. It is ORDERED: 1. That the petitioner’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis [3] is GRANTED. 2. No later than January 20, 2020, the respondents, through the Attorney General of the State of Mississippi, must file a response to this petition, along with all relevant transcripts of the proceedings in the state courts of Mississippi arising from the petitioner’s conviction for sexual battery in the Circuit Court of Washington County, Mississippi. 3. Within fourteen (14) days of service upon him of a copy of the respondents’ response, the petitioner may file his reply to the allegations contained in the response. 4. The Clerk of Court will serve by email (Return Receipt, High Importance) a copy of the petition, this order, acknowledgment of service of process form, and any other initial filings, upon Jim Hood, Attorney General of the State of Mississippi, or his lawful successor, to Assistant Attorneys General Jerrolyn Owens and Bridgette Grant. The respondent must electronically file the completed acknowledgment of service of process form upon receipt. Petitioner is warned that failure to keep this court informed of his current address could lead to dismissal of his lawsuit. This, the 6th day of November, 2019. /s/ Roy Percy UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?