James, et al v. Ailes, et al

Filing 51

ORDER granting in part and denying in part 46 Motion for Reconsideration. The Government is required to respond to permitted discovery within 15 days of the date of this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jane M. Virden on 1/15/21. (ncb)

Case: 4:20-cv-00124-DMB-JMV Doc #: 51 Filed: 01/15/21 1 of 6 PageID #: 550

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
GREENVILLE DIVISION
ROY L. JAMES AND ETHEL JAMES
v.

PLAINTIFFS
CIVIL ACTION NO.: 4:20-cv-124-DMB-JMV

ENOCH AILES, JR., et al.

DEFENDANTS

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING
IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION REURGING
JURISDICTIONAL DISCOVERY

This matter is before the court following a hearing on the record on January 12, 2021, on
plaintiffs’ motion to reconsider this court’s prior order on their request for jurisdictional discovery
of the United States (“Government”). For the reasons articulated in the court’s original order, the
defendant’s response to both the original motion for discovery and the re-urged motion, and further
articulated by the court during the hearing, the court finds that with the exceptions noted below,
the proposed discovery, including general reference to “depositions,” is not narrowly tailored to
reveal materially relevant information necessary to resolve the pending motion to dismiss on
grounds of immunity. See Freeman v. U.S., 556 F.3d 326, 341-42 (5th Cir. 2009) (Generally, “a
party is not entitled to jurisdictional discovery if the record shows that the requested discovery is
not likely to produce the facts needed to withstand a . . . [motion to dismiss] . . . . This is particularly
true where the party seeking discovery is attempting to disprove the applicability of an immunityderived bar to suit because immunity is intended to shield the defendant from the burdens of
defending the suit, including the burdens of discovery.”). Accordingly, the motion is denied,
except that the following proposed discovery requests (some as modified) are permitted, and the

Case: 4:20-cv-00124-DMB-JMV Doc #: 51 Filed: 01/15/21 2 of 6 PageID #: 551

Government is required to respond to them—in accord with its rights/obligations under the Federal
Rules of Civil Procedure—within 15 days of the date of this order:1
1. Permitted Discovery
Interrogatories
4. Who was the employer of the Enoch Ailes, Jr., on the date of and at the
moment of the crash?
11. (as modified). Who determined what route, the miles, and/or the hours
Enoch Ailes, Jr., drove on the day of the crash?
15. Does the United States Postal Service have to approve drivers hired by
Enoch Ailes, Jr., to drive the postal service routes?
Requests for Production
7. (as modified). Produce a copy of all guidelines, manual, policies,
handbooks, and other documents and things that the USPS applies to the
defendant(s) with whom it is contracted in this case.
Requests for Admission
5. Admit that the driver/Enoch Ailes, Jr., is not allowed to determine the
route he takes to deliver, haul and pick-up the mail.
6. Admit that the USPS provides strict guidelines for how the driver is
supposed to dress while hauling mail.
8. (as modified) Admit that Enoch Ailes, Jr., was screened by the USPS for
eligibility to drive.
9. (as modified) Admit that if the defendant contractor hires a new employee
to be a driver, the driver will also be screened by the USPS for eligibility to drive.
2. Discovery Not Permitted
The following proposed discovery requests are not narrowly tailored to or are irrelevant as
to the issues raised in the jurisdictional motion to dismiss, i.e., independent contractor status versus

1

The Government may request additional time, as warranted, for good cause.

-2-

Case: 4:20-cv-00124-DMB-JMV Doc #: 51 Filed: 01/15/21 3 of 6 PageID #: 552

employee status2 and discretionary versus ministerial function,3 or are redundant of permitted
discovery and the pre-existing disclosure of the contract for services between USPS and the
defendant contractor:
Interrogatories
1. Please identify the date, time, method, by whom and to whom the crash
was reported to the USPS?
2. Please state the names and last known residence addresses of the
defendants who saw the crash complained of in Plaintiffs’ complaint?
3. Do you have in your possession, power, or control photographs showing
the damage to the vehicle immediately following the crash? If you have such
photographs where, when [hour and date], and by whom were said photographs
taken.
5. In what areas (counties) were Enoch Ailes, Jr., working on the date of the
crash?
6. At what time would Enoch Ailes, Jr., route terminate on the date of the
crash?
7. How much does Enoch Ailes, Jr., get paid per year?
8. On what basis did Enoch Ailes, Jr., get paid per year?
9. Please state the total number of hours Enoch Ailes, Jr., drove on the day
of the crash.
“The ‘critical factor’ in distinguishing an independent contractor from an employee is the power of
the federal government ‘to control the detailed physical performance of the contractor.’” Smith v.
United States, No. 198CV249-SD, 1999 WL 33537153, at *1 (N.D. Miss. May 18, 1999), aff'd, 245
F.3d 790 (5th Cir. 2000). Other factors the court considers are:
2

(1) whether the work requires a person who is highly educated or skilled; (2)
whether the work is typically performed by an employee in the locale or by an
independent contractor; (3) whether the employer supplies the tools,
instrumentalities, or place of work; (4) whether the employment is for a
considerable period of time with regular hours; (5) whether payment is by the
hour or month; (6) whether the work is full-time employment by one employer;
(7) whether the work is part of the employer's regular business; and (8) whether
the parties believe they have created an employment relationship.
Id. at *1-2.
The discretionary function exception bars suits if two conditions are met: “(1) the acts alleged to be
negligent must be discretionary, in that they involve an element of judgment or choice and are not
compelled by statute or regulation and (2) the judgment or choice in question must be grounded in
considerations of public policy or susceptible to policy analysis.” Molchatsky v. United States, 713
F.3d 159, 162 (2d Cir. 2013) (per curiam) (internal quotation marks omitted).
3

-3-

Case: 4:20-cv-00124-DMB-JMV Doc #: 51 Filed: 01/15/21 4 of 6 PageID #: 553

10. Please state the total number miles did [sic] Enoch Ailes, Jr., drive on
the day of the crash.
12. Who determines what happens if Enoch Ailes, Jr., drives more miles
than what he is scheduled to drive? What would happen?
13. Who determines what happens if Enoch Ailes drives more hours these
he is scheduled to drive? What would happen?
14. Who determines what happens if Enoch Ailes drives a different route
than he is scheduled to drive? What would happen?
16. Was knowledge of and adherence to the Highway Contractor Safety
Handbook P0-515 a requirement of the USPS that applied to Enoch Ailes, Jr.?
17. Does the United States Postal Service require all leased and contracted
vehicles to follow the Highway Contractor Safety Handbook P0-515? If so, was
Enoch Ailes, Jr., a part of this network.
18. Does the United States Postal Service operate one of the largest
transportation networks in the world?
19. Do the guidelines in the Highway Contractor Safety Handbook P0-515
apply to all leased and contracted vehicles engaged in Postal Service business?
20. What is the purpose of the Highway Contractor Safety Handbook P0515?
Requests for Production
1. Produce Defendants Enoch Ailes Jr., Gwendolyn Ailes and/or B. H.
Wellington, Inc., written proof of combined single limited of $750,000.00
insurance coverage submitted to USPS for the year 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018 and
2019.
2. Produce Defendants Enoch Ailes Jr., Gwendolyn Ailes and/or B.H.
Wellington, Inc., written verified proof of proper equipment certification submitted
to USPS for the year 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018 and 2019.
3. Produce a copy of any and all communication, including but not limited
to video, audio, e-mails, text messages and otherwise, between Enoch Ailes Jr.,
Gwendolyn Ailes and/or B.H. Wellington, Inc., and the USPS, 72 hours
immediately prior to the crash that is the subject of this lawsuit.
4. Produce a copy of any and all communication including, but not limited
to video, audio, e-mails, text messages and otherwise, between Enoch Ailes Jr.,
Gwendolyn Ailes and/or B.H. Wellington, Inc., and the USPS, 72 hours
immediately after the crash that is the subject of this lawsuit.
5. Produce a copy the Highway Contractor Safety Handbook P0-515
utilized by the USPS on the day of the crash.

-4-

Case: 4:20-cv-00124-DMB-JMV Doc #: 51 Filed: 01/15/21 5 of 6 PageID #: 554

6. Produce a copy of all guidelines, manual, policies, handbooks, and other
documents and things that the USPS provides to contractors.
8. Produce a copy of all guidelines, manual, policies, handbooks, and other
documents and things that the USPS provides to employees.
9. Produce a copy of all guidelines, manual, policies, handbooks, and other
documents and things that the USPS uses to screen drivers.
10. Produce a copy of all guidelines, manual, policies, handbooks, and other
documents and things that the USPS provides to contractors and employees.
11. Produce a copy of all guidelines, manual, policies, handbooks, and other
documents and things that the USPS applies to contractors.
12. Produce a copy of all guidelines, manual, policies, handbooks, and other
documents and things that the USPS applies to employees.
Requests for Admission
1. Admit that according to the Highway Contractor Safety Handbook P0515, Section 143 “Field”, 143.1 Administrative Officials, Administrative officials
(AOs) implement and monitor the day-to-day actions required by these and other
safety guidelines.
2. Admit that “41 General” 42 Civil Laws say “you must obey all state and
local traffic laws when driving any postal service vehicle.
3. Admit that “41 General” 42 Civil Laws which say “you must obey all
state and local traffic laws when driving any postal service vehicle” applies to
contract individuals as well as employees/agents.
4. Admit that “41 General” 42 Civil Laws which say “you must obey all
state and local traffic laws when driving any postal service vehicle” is generally
saying that contact individuals as well as employees are driving a vehicle on behalf
of the postal service.
7. Admit contractors must ensure that their vehicles meet minimum safety
requirements and that they and their employees operate vehicles in a safe manner
as specified by these and other safety guidelines including the Federal Motor
Carrier Safety Regulation.
8. Admit that all drivers are screened by the USPS for eligibility to drive.
9. Admit that if a contractor hires a new employee to be a driver the driver
will also be screened by the USPS for eligibility to drive.
10. Admit that if Plaintiff hires a new employee to be a driver and the driver
is found to be ineligible to drive by the USPS during its driver screening process,
the driver will not be allowed to drive under the United States Postal Service
Contract.

-5-

Case: 4:20-cv-00124-DMB-JMV Doc #: 51 Filed: 01/15/21 6 of 6 PageID #: 555

11. Admit that Safety does not begin at the tailgate of a truck; it begins on
the dock, and employees and contractors must adhere to all USPS safety guidelines
at all times.
12. Admit that the USPS has guidelines, policies, manuals, procedures that
are applied equally to both employees and independent contractors.
13. Admit that the USPS has terminated contacts with drivers who failed to
have the $750,000.00 combined single limit insurance coverage as required by their
contract with the USPS.
14. Admit that the USPS has terminated at least 3 contracts with drivers
who failed to have the $750,000.00 combined single limit insurance coverage as
required by their contract with the USPS.
15. Admit that Donna Parks actions and failures to act or omissions were
not discretionary functions her duties were contractual requirements, contractual
directives per the Contract Route Service Order Number 38760.
16. Admit that Keith L. Harris actions and failures to act or omissions were
not discretionary functions her duties were contractual requirements, contractual
directives per the Contract Route Service Order Number 38760.
17. Admit that Plaintiffs never filed a breach of contract claim against the
Defendants.
SO ORDERED this 15th day of January, 2021.

/s/ Jane M. Virden
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

-6-