Coleman v. Morris et al

Filing 29

ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff's Motion 26 to Amend Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge David A. Sanders on 7/16/21. (cb)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI GREENVILLE DIVISION WILBERT COLEMAN PLAINTIFF v. No. 4:20CV126-DAS TIMOTHY MORRIS, ET AL. DEFENDANTS ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION [26] TO AMEND COMPLAINT This matter comes before the court on the motion [26] by the plaintiff to amend his complaint. A “court should freely give leave [to amend] when justice so requires.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)). Although not automatic, the decision to grant or deny such leave is within the sound discretion of the district court. Bloom v. Bexar County, Texas, 130 F.3d 722, 727 (5th Cir. 1997), Halbert v. City of Sherman, 33 F.3d 526, 529 (5th Cir. 1994). The motion [26] is well taken and is GRANTED. The instant complaint is deemed amended as of the date the instant motion was filed. SO ORDERED, this, the 16th day of July, 2021. /s/ David A. Sanders DAVID A. SANDERS UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?