Williams v. State of Mississippi

Filing 10

ORDER transferring petition to U.S. Court of Appeals - 5th Circuit to determine if petitioner is allowed to file successive habeas petition in this court. CASE CLOSED. Signed by District Judge Debra M. Brown on 12/6/22. (cb)

Case: 4:22-cv-00175-DMB-DAS Doc #: 10 Filed: 12/06/22 1 of 2 PageID #: 105

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
GREENVILLE DIVISION
KACY WILLIAMS

PLAINTIFF

V.

NO. 4:22-CV-175-DMB-DAS

STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

RESPONDENT

ORDER
On or about October 11, 2022, Kacy Williams filed in the United States District Court for
the Northern District of Mississippi a “Petition Seeking a Judicial Review” challenging his
conviction in the Circuit Court of Leflore County, Mississippi, for one count of possession of a firearm
by a convicted felon. Doc. #1 at 1. The Court construed the document as a petition for a writ of habeas
corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 and on November 9, 2022, ordered Williams to submit the proper form
for seeking habeas corpus relief to amend the initial petition. Doc. #4. On November 23, 2022,
Williams amended his petition for a writ of habeas corpus by submitting the proper form. Doc. #6.
The Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act requires that before a second or successive
petition is filed in the district court, “the applicant shall move in the appropriate court of appeals for
an order authorizing the district court to consider the application.” 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(A). Section
“2244(b)(3)(A) acts as a jurisdictional bar to the district court’s asserting jurisdiction over any
successive habeas petition until [the Fifth Circuit] has granted the petitioner permission to file one.”
Crone v. Cockrell, 324 F.3d 833, 836 (5th Cir. 2003). While “a district court may dispose of
applications lacking authorization through dismissal” for lack of jurisdiction, it may, pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 1631, transfer such a petition to the Fifth Circuit, the court with jurisdiction over the action,
“upon a finding that the petition is successive.” United States v. Fulton, 780 F.3d 683, 686 (5th Cir.
2015).
Williams has filed at least one unsuccessful § 2254 petition challenging the same conviction

Case: 4:22-cv-00175-DMB-DAS Doc #: 10 Filed: 12/06/22 2 of 2 PageID #: 106

he challenges here. See Williams v. State of Mississippi, No. 4:19-cv-95 (N.D. Miss. Mar. 23, 2021),
aff’d, No. 21-60354, 2022 WL 12524900 (5th Cir. Mar. 28, 2022), cert. denied, 142 S. Ct. 2843 (2022).
However, Williams has not obtained an order of authorization to purse this successive petition. In the
interest of justice and judicial economy, Williams’ petition and the entire record of this case shall be
TRANSFERRED to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 2244(a) &
(b)(3)(c), and 28 U.S.C. § 1631. This case is CLOSED.

SO ORDERED, this 6th day of December, 2022.
/s/Debra M. Brown
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2