Northrop Grumman v. Ministry of Defense, et al
Filing
425
FINAL JUDGMENT: Ordered that judgment is entered against the Defendant in the amount of $137,977,646.43. Ordered that Plaintiff's claims for a maritime lien and for injunctive relief are dismissed without prejudice. Signed by District Judge Halil S. Ozerden on 6/4/20. (JCH)
Case 1:02-cv-00785-HSO-RHW Document 425 Filed 06/04/20 Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
SOUTHERN DIVISION
NORTHROP GRUMMAN SHIP
SYSTEMS, INC., formerly known as
Ingalls Shipbuilding, Inc.
v.
PLAINTIFF
Civil No. 1:02cv785-HSO-RHW
THE MINISTRY OF DEFENSE OF THE
REPUBLIC OF VENEZUELA
DEFENDANT
THE MINISTRY OF DEFENSE OF THE
REPUBLIC OF VENEZUELA
COUNTER-CLAIMANT
v.
NORTHROP GRUMMAN SHIP
SYSTEMS, INC.
COUNTER-DEFENDANT
FINAL JUDGMENT
In accordance with the Memorandum Opinion and Order Granting Plaintiff’s
Request for Entry of Final Judgment Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
58(d) entered herewith, the Court enters judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure 58. Accordingly,
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that, judgment is
entered against Defendant The Ministry of Defense of the Republic of Venezuela in
the amount of $137,977,646.43, inclusive of pre-award interest, plus costs and fees.
This amount shall be subject to post-judgment interest pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1961,
accruing from the date of this Court’s March 31, 2020, Memorandum Opinion and
Order [406].
Case 1:02-cv-00785-HSO-RHW Document 425 Filed 06/04/20 Page 2 of 2
IT IS, FURTHER, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that, Plaintiff Northrop
Grumman Ship Systems, Inc., f/k/a Ingalls Shipbuilding, Inc.’s claims for a
maritime lien and for injunctive relief are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED this the 4th day of June, 2020.
s/Halil Suleyman Ozerden
HALIL SULEYMAN OZERDEN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?