Rigsby et al v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company et al

Filing 344

ORDER GRANTING Defendants' unopposed 340 Motion for Leave to File; DENYING State Farm Fire and Casualty Company's 91 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction; GRANTING State Farm Fire and Casualty Company's 96 Motion for Summar y Judgment; DENYING State Farm Fire Insurance Company's 98 Motion to Dismiss; DENYING Haag Engineering Company's 106 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction; DENYING Haag Engineering Company's 108 Motion to Dismiss; GRANTING R elators' 206 Motion to Clarify the Order excluding their testimony in civil actions against State Farm Fire and Casualty Company. To the extent the Relators have relevant knowledge, they will be permitted to testify in all further proceedings in this action. Further proceedings in this action shall be limited to the specific allegations of the Amended Complaint, i.e. to the allegation the payment of the limits of SFIP coverage on the McIntosh property and the presentment of a claim for reimbursement to the United States of America constitutes a violation of the FCA. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company shall submit, in camera, a list containing the name of the insured, the address of the insured property, and the amount of flood insurance paid, for all SFIP claims that meet three criteria. Signed by Senior Judge L. T. Senter, Jr, on 08/10/2009 (kbo)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA EX REL. CORI RIGSBY and KERRI RIGSBY V. RELATORS CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:06CV0433 LTS-RHW DEFENDANTS STATE FARM INSURANCE COMPANY, ET AL. ORDER In accordance with the Memorandum Opinion I have this day signed, it is hereby ORDERED 1. That the Relators' motion [206] for clarification of the Order [1173] excluding their testimony in civil actions against State Farm Fire and Casualty Company is GRANTED. To the extent the Relators have relevant knowledge, they will be permitted to testify in all further proceedings in this action; That State Farm Fire and Casualty Company's motion for summary judgment [96] on the Relators' claim for wrongful discharge from their employment is GRANTED; That State Farm Fire and Casualty Company's motion [91] and Haag Engineering Company's motion [106] to dismiss this action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, or, in the alternative for summary judgment, are DENIED on the grounds that Relator Kerri Rigsby is an original source of the information that supports the allegations of the Amended Complaint; and That State Farm Fire Insurance Company's motion [98] and Haag Engineering Company's motion [108] to dismiss this action under F.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) and 9(b) are DENIED; and That further proceedings in this action shall be limited to the specific allegations of the Amended Complaint, i.e. to the allegation the payment of the limits of SFIP coverage on the McIntosh property and the presentment of a claim for reimbursement to the United States of America constitutes a violation of the FCA; That State Farm Fire and Casualty Company shall submit, in camera, a list containing the name of the insured, the address of the insured property, and the amount of flood insurance paid, for all SFIP claims that meet all three of the following criteria: 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. A) B) C) The insured property did not fall within any of the three categories of storm damage for which FEMA approved payment of SFIP limits, i.e. insured dwellings that were not left as slabs, pilings, or empty shells; and For which SFIP limits were paid on the grounds the property was a constructive total loss; and For which no "stick built" or Exactimate estimation of the flood damage was made before the SFIP limits were paid; 7. That the defendants' unopposed motion [340] to allow the parties to file their post-hearing briefs into the record is GRANTED. SO ORDERED this 10th day of August, 2009. s/ L. T. Senter, Jr. L. T. SENTER, JR. SENIOR JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?