Cummings v. Fortis Benefits Insurance Company et al

Filing 30

ORDER re: Court's Memorandum Opinion 29 addressing Defendant Union Security Insurance Company's motion to dismiss Plaintiff's state law claims. Defendant's motion to dismiss 27 is granted; each party shall bear their respective costs. Signed by Judge Walter J. Gex III on June 1, 2007.(Gex, Kathleen)

Cummings v. Fortis Benefits Insurance Company et al

Doc. 30

Case 1:06-cv-00667-WJG-JMR

Document 30

Filed 06/01/2007

Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN DIVISION

MARY J. CUMMINGS VERSUS UNION SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY and DEFENDANTS AAA, BBB, CCC ORDER

PLAINTIFF CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:06cv667WJG-JMR DEFENDANTS

THIS CAUSE is before the Court on motion [27-1] of Defendant Union Security Insurance Company [Union Security] to dismiss Plaintiff's state law claims including breach of contract, bad faith, malicious misrepresentation, and punitive damages. Pursuant to the Memorandum Opinion entered in this cause, this date, incorporated herein by reference, it is therefore, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Defendant's motion to dismiss [27-1] Plaintiff's state law claims in this case be, and is hereby, granted. It is further, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that each party shall bear their respective costs associated with this motion. SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED this the 1st day of June, 2007.

UNITED STATES SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

Dockets.Justia.com