Stewart v. Perry et al

Filing 44

JUDGMENT incorporating the Memorandum Opinion 43 concerning Defendant Ocean Springs Police Department's [OSPD] motion 32 to dismiss, granting OSPD's motion and dismissing OSPD with prejudice, and further ordering that the parties shall bear their respective costs. Defendant OSPD terminated. Signed by District Judge Walter J. Gex III on September 4, 2008. (Gex, Kathleen)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN DIVISION TANYA DENISE STEWART VERSUS JOHNNIE MAE PERRY; JACKSON COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI; SINGING RIVER HOSPITAL SYSTEMS; SINGING RIVER HOSPITAL; OCEAN SPRINGS HOSPITAL; GREGORY HORN, M.D.; OCEAN SPRINGS POLICE DEPARTMENT; DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES; HARRISON COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI; DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES; DEANNA CHASE; LANA M. HODA; BILOXI POLICE DEPARTMENT; HARRISON COUNTY YOUTH COURT; MISSISSIPPI FAMILY COURT; YOUTH COURT OF HARRISON COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI; MICHAEL D. WARD, YOUTH COURT JUDGE; HERBERT WILSON, YOUTH COURT PROSECUTOR; ANGELIQUE WHITE, GUARDIAN AD LITEM JUDGMENT PLAINTIFF CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:07cv1270WJG-JMR DEFENDANTS THIS MATTER is before the Court on the motion [32] filed by Defendant Ocean Springs Police Department [OSPD], to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Pursuant to the Memorandum Opinion entered in this cause, this date, incorporated herein by reference, it is therefore, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Defendant OSPD's motion to dismiss [32] be, and is hereby, granted. It is further, Page 1 of 2 ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that all claims advanced against the OSPD are dismissed with prejudice. It is further, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that each party bear their respective costs associated with this motion. SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED this the 4th day of September, 2008. UNITED STATES SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?