Stewart v. Perry et al

Filing 75

ORDER: Pursuant to the Court's Memorandum Opinion 74 addressing the motion 55 for summary judgment filed by Defendants Deanna Chase and Lana M. Hoda, Defendants' motion for summary judgment on Plaintiff's 1983 claim against Defenda nts in their individual capacities is granted, and the claim is dismissed with prejudice; any state law claims are dismissed without prejudice; the parties shall bear their respective costs. Signed by District Judge Walter J. Gex III on September 8, 2009. (Gex, Kathleen)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN DIVISION TANYA DENISE STEWART VERSUS JACKSON COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI; ET AL. SUMMARY JUDGMENT THIS MATTER is before the Court on the motion [55] of Defendants Deanna Chase and Lana M. Hoda for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Pursuant to the Memorandum Opinion entered in this cause, this date, incorporated herein by reference, it is therefore, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Defendants' motion for summary judgment [55] be, and is hereby, granted. It is further, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that all claims advanced against Chase and Hoda in their individual capacities pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 be, and are hereby, dismissed with prejudice. It is further, ORDER AND ADJUDGED that all claims advanced against Chase and Hoda in their individual capacities under state law, if any, be, and are hereby, dismissed without prejudice. It is further, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that each party bear their respective costs associated with this motion. SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED, this the 8th day of September, 2009. PLAINTIFF CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:07cv1270WJG-JMR DEFENDANTS

UNITED STATES SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

Page 1 of 1