Gildersleeve v. Historic Renovations of Yazoo, Inc. et al

Filing 64

FINAL JUDGMENT: Ordered that Plaintiff, Lynn Gildersleeve, shall recover Judgment from the Defendant, Historic Renovations of Yazoo, Inc., in the amount of $22,557.00; and Plaintiff Lynn Gildersleeve take nothing from Defendant Alan Ramsay. Defendant, Historic Renovations of Yazoo, Inc., shall recover Judgment from the Plaintiff, Lynn Gildersleeve, in the amount of $21,509.72. Parties shall bear their own costs. Signed by District Judge Louis Guirola, Jr. on 9/14/10 (RLW)

Download PDF
G i l d e r s l e e v e v. Historic Renovations of Yazoo, Inc. et al D o c . 64 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT F O R THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI S O U T H E R N DIVISION L Y N N GILDERSLEEVE v. H I S T O R I C RENOVATIONS O F YAZOO, INC. and A L A N RAMSAY § § § § § § § P L A I N T I FF C A U S E NO. 1:09cv134 LG-RHW DEFENDANTS F I N A L JUDGMENT T h i s action came on for trial on Tuesday, September 7, 2010, before the Court and a jury w ith Honorable Louis Guirola, Jr., United States District Judge, presiding. The issues have been d u ly tried, and the jury has heard all of the evidence and argument of counsel and received in s t ru c t io n s of the Court, including a Verdict Form. The jury retired to consider their verdict a n d returned upon their oaths, into open Court, the following verdict, to-wit: Q u e s tio n Number One D o you find by a preponderance of the evidence that the Plaintiff, Lynn G i ld e rs le e v e , entered into a contract with Historic Renovations of Yazoo, Inc. for the c o n s tru c t io n , repair and restoration of her home and additional structures? A n s w e r "yes" or "no": Yes Q u e s tio n Number Two D o you find by a preponderance of the evidence that Historic Renovations o f Yazoo, Inc., materially breached the contract and as a result of the breach, the P la in tiff, Lynn Gildersleeve, suffered damages? Answer "yes" or "no": Yes Dockets.Justia.com Question Number Three Do you find by a preponderance of the evidence that the Plaintiff Lynn G i ld e rs le e v e entered into a contract with Alan Ramsay, individually, for the c o n s tru c t io n , repair and restoration of her home and additional structures? A n sw e r "yes" or "no": No Q u e s tio n Number Five If your answers to Questions Number Two or Four (or both) are "yes," w h a t amount of money, if any, would adequately compensate the Plaintiff for her d a m a g e s for breach of contract? A n s w e r in dollars and cents or "none": $22,557 Q u e s t i o n Number Six D o you find by a preponderance of the evidence that the Plaintiff, Lynn G i ld e rs le e v e , materially breached a contract with Historic Renovations of Yazoo, In c . for the construction, repair and restoration of her home and additional s tru c t u r e s , and that Historic Renovations of Yazoo, Inc. suffered damages as a r e s u l t? A n s w e r "yes" or "no": Yes Q u e s t io n Number Seven W h a t amount of money, if any, would adequately compensate Historic R e n o v a t io n s of Yazoo, Inc. for its damages? A n s w e r in dollars and cents, for damages, if any, or answer "none." C o m p e n s a to ry damages: $21,509.72 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Plaintiff, Lynn G i ld e r s l e e v e , does have and shall recover Judgment of and from the Defendant, Historic Renovations of Yazoo, Inc., in the sum and amount of Twenty Two Thousand Five Hundred F i ft y Seven Dollars ($22,557). I T IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiff Lynn Gildersleeve take n o th in g from Defendant Alan Ramsay. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Defendant, Historic R e n o v a ti o n s of Yazoo, Inc., does have and shall recover Judgment of and from the Plaintiff, Lyn n Gildersleeve, in the sum and amount of Twenty One Thousand Five Hundred and Nine D o l la r s and Seventy Two Cents ($21,509.72). I T IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the parties shall bear their own costs. SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED this the 14th day of September, 2010. s/ Louis Guirola, Jr. LOUIS GUIROLA, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?