Randall v. Scott et al

Filing 14

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 4 Respondent's Motion to Dismiss; adopting 11 Report and Recommendations of Chief Magistrate Judge Roper entered 1/8/2010, and overruling Randall's Objection entered 1/22/2010. A separate judgment will be entered. Signed by District Judge Halil S. Ozerden on 1/26/2010. (avm)

Download PDF
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

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?