Malone v. MDOC

Filing 16

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 15 Report and Recommendations. Ordered that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is dismissed. Signed by Chief District Judge Louis Guirola, Jr. on 5/31/11. (RLW)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DIVISION OF MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN DISTRICT DORIS WAYNE MALONE V. MDOC § § § § § PETITIONER CAUSE NO. 1:09cv333-LG-RHW RESPONDENT ORDER ADOPTING PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION This cause comes before the Court on the Proposed Findings of Fact and Recommendation [15] of United States Magistrate Judge Robert H. Walker, entered in this cause on May 11, 2011, in which he recommends dismissing the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus [1] for failure to exhaust State remedies. Petitioner Doris Wayne Malone has not filed objections to the Magistrate Judge’s recommendations. The Court finds that the Magistrate Judge properly recommended that the Petition be dismissed for failure to exhaust State remedies. After referral of hearing by this Court, no objections having been filed as to the Proposed Findings of Fact and Recommendation, and the Court, having fully reviewed the same as well as the record in this matter, and being duly advised in the premises, finds that said Proposed Findings of Fact and Recommendation should be adopted as the opinion of this Court. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Proposed Findings of Fact and Recommendation [15] of United States Magistrate Judge Robert H. Walker, entered on May 11, 2011, be, and the same is hereby, adopted as the findings of this Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the [1] Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is DISMISSED. A separate judgment will be entered in accordance with this Order as required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 58. SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED this the 31st day of May, 2011. s/ Louis Guirola, Jr. LOUIS GUIROLA, JR. CHIEF U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?