Octave v. Beau Rivage Resorts, Inc. et al

Filing 102

ORDER DISMISSING CASE: Ordered that Plaintiff's claims against Defendants ABC and DEF are dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk of Court may now close the case. Signed by District Judge Louis Guirola, Jr. on 4/11/11 (RLW)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN DIVISION BETTY OCTAVE v. BEAU RIVAGE RESORTS, ET AL. § § § § § PLAINTIFF CAUSE NO. 1:09CV753 LG-RHW DEFENDANTS ORDER OF DISMISSAL THIS CAUSE comes before the Court sua sponte for consideration of dismissal. The named Defendants, Beau Rivage Resorts, Inc. and ThyssenKrupp Elevator Corporation, obtained summary judgment of Plaintiff’s claims against them on March 22, 2011. (ECF No. 101) In the Memorandum Opinion and Order granting summary judgment, the Court noted that Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants ABC and DEF remained. Plaintiff was required to file an amended complaint identifying these fictional defendants within 20 days of the date of the Memorandum Opinion and Order if she intended to pursue her claims against them. She was warned that her failure to do so would result in dismissal of the claims. More than 20 days have passed, and Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint. Accordingly, her claims against the fictional defendants will be dismissed without prejudice. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants ABC and DEF are DISMISSED without prejudice. The Clerk of Court may now close the case. SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED this the 11th day of April, 2011. s/ Louis Guirola, Jr. LOUIS GUIROLA, JR. CHIEF U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?