Carl E. Woodward, LLC. et al v. Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut et al

Filing 379

FINAL JUDGMENT: Ordered that the Plaintiffs shall recover from the Defendants a total Judgment of $999,144.79. Ordered that the Plaintiffs shall recover from the Defendant post-judgment interest at the rate of 0.18% on the entire Judgment from the date of the entry of Final Judgment until paid. Signed by District Judge Halil S. Ozerden on 5/3/12. (JCH)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN DIVISION CARL E. WOODWARD, LLC, and GRAY INSURANCE CO. v. PLAINTIFFS CAUSE NO. 1:09CV781-HSO-RHW ACCEPTANCE INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY DEFENDANT FINAL JUDGMENT Pursuant to the Memorandum Opinion and Order [200] entered on January 12, 2011, the Order [248] granting Partial Judgment as a Matter of Law entered on March 23, 2011, the jury verdict returned on March 23, 2011, the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law announced on the record on February 23, 2012, and the Memorandum Opinion and Order [378] entered contemporaneously herewith, IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that, Plaintiffs Carl E. Woodward, LLC, and Gray Insurance Company shall recover from Defendant Acceptance Indemnity Insurance Company compensatory damages in the amount of $482,026.46, and extra-contractual damages in the amount of $517,118.33, for a total Judgment of $999,144.79. IT IS, FURTHER, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that, Plaintiffs Carl E. Woodward, LLC, and Gray Insurance Company shall recover from Defendant Acceptance Indemnity Insurance Company post-judgment interest at the rate of 0.18% on the entire Judgment from the date of the entry of Final Judgment until paid, as prescribed by 28 U.S.C. ยง 1961. SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED, this the 3rd day of May, 2012. s/ Halil Suleyman Ozerden HALIL SULEYMAN OZERDEN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?