Williams v. Rouse et al

Filing 30

ORDER ADOPTING 28 Report and Recommendations : defendant Marie Duncan is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Chief District Judge Louis Guirola, Jr on 7/18/2011. (avm)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN DIVISION DARRELL WILLIAMS § § VERSUS § § DEVON ROUSE, JAROME BARNES, § aka JEROME BARNES, and MARIE § DUNCAN § PLAINTIFF CAUSE NO. 1:10cv300-LG-RHW DEFENDANTS ORDER ADOPTING PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATIONS BEFORE THE COURT is the [28] Proposed Findings of Fact and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Robert H. Walker, entered in this cause on June 14, 2011, in which he recommends that Defendant Marie Duncan be dismissed for failure to serve process. Pro se Plaintiff Darrell Williams has not filed objections to the Magistrate Judge’s recommendations. To date, process has not be served upon her. The Court finds that the Magistrate Judge properly recommended that Duncan be dismissed without prejudice for Williams’s failure to serve process upon and otherwise prosecute the case against her. After referral of hearing by this Court, no objections having been filed as to the Proposed Findings of Fact and Recommendations, and the Court, having reviewed the same and being duly advised in the premises, finds that said Proposed Findings of Fact and Recommendations should be adopted as the opinion of this Court. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the [28] Proposed Findings of Fact and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Robert H. Walker, entered on June 14, 2011, be, and the same hereby is, adopted as the findings of this Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Defendant Marie Duncan is dismissed without prejudice. SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED this the 18th day of July, 2011. s/ Louis Guirola, Jr. LOUIS GUIROLA, JR. CHIEF U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?