Burns v. Astrue

Filing 19

JUDGMENT: This lawsuit is dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Signed by Chief District Judge Louis Guirola, Jr. on 6/12/12. (RLW)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN DIVISION DAUN CHALLENCER BURNS PLAINTIFF v. CAUSE NO. 1:10CV483-LG-RHW MICHAEL J. ASTRUE DEFENDANT JUDGMENT This matter having come on to be heard on the Proposed Findings of Fact and Recommendation [17] entered by United States Magistrate Judge Robert H. Walker on May 16, 2012, the Court, after a full review and consideration of the Motion, the pleadings on file and the relevant legal authority, finds that in accord with the Order entered herein, IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the the Proposed Findings of Fact and Recommendation [17] entered by United States Magistrate Judge Robert H. Walker is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. IT IS, FURTHER, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Commissioner’s Motion to Dismiss [12] is GRANTED and Burns’ Motion for Judgment [15] is DENIED. This lawsuit is hereby DISMISSED FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION. SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED this the 12th day of June, 2012. s/ Louis Guirola, Jr. LOUIS GUIROLA, JR. CHIEF U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?