Burns v. Astrue
Filing
19
JUDGMENT: This lawsuit is dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Signed by Chief District Judge Louis Guirola, Jr. on 6/12/12. (RLW)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
SOUTHERN DIVISION
DAUN CHALLENCER BURNS
PLAINTIFF
v.
CAUSE NO. 1:10CV483-LG-RHW
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
DEFENDANT
JUDGMENT
This matter having come on to be heard on the Proposed Findings of Fact and
Recommendation [17] entered by United States Magistrate Judge Robert H. Walker
on May 16, 2012, the Court, after a full review and consideration of the Motion, the
pleadings on file and the relevant legal authority, finds that in accord with the
Order entered herein,
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the the
Proposed Findings of Fact and Recommendation [17] entered by United States
Magistrate Judge Robert H. Walker is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court.
IT IS, FURTHER, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Commissioner’s
Motion to Dismiss [12] is GRANTED and Burns’ Motion for Judgment [15] is
DENIED. This lawsuit is hereby DISMISSED FOR LACK OF SUBJECT
MATTER JURISDICTION.
SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED this the 12th day of June, 2012.
s/
Louis Guirola, Jr.
LOUIS GUIROLA, JR.
CHIEF U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?