Burns v. Astrue

Filing 19

JUDGMENT: This lawsuit is dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Signed by Chief District Judge Louis Guirola, Jr. on 6/12/12. (RLW)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
SOUTHERN DIVISION
DAUN CHALLENCER BURNS

PLAINTIFF

v.

CAUSE NO. 1:10CV483-LG-RHW

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE

DEFENDANT
JUDGMENT

This matter having come on to be heard on the Proposed Findings of Fact and
Recommendation [17] entered by United States Magistrate Judge Robert H. Walker
on May 16, 2012, the Court, after a full review and consideration of the Motion, the
pleadings on file and the relevant legal authority, finds that in accord with the
Order entered herein,
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the the
Proposed Findings of Fact and Recommendation [17] entered by United States
Magistrate Judge Robert H. Walker is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court.
IT IS, FURTHER, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Commissioner’s
Motion to Dismiss [12] is GRANTED and Burns’ Motion for Judgment [15] is
DENIED. This lawsuit is hereby DISMISSED FOR LACK OF SUBJECT
MATTER JURISDICTION.
SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED this the 12th day of June, 2012.
s/

Louis Guirola, Jr.

LOUIS GUIROLA, JR.
CHIEF U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE