Comer et al v. Murphy Oil USA, Inc. et al
Filing
292
JUDGMENT : because this Court does not have jurisdiction over the plaintiffs' lawsuit and because plaintiffs have failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, judgment is rendered in favor of Defendants; this case is dismissed. Signed by Chief District Judge Louis Guirola, Jr on 3/20/2012. (avm)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
SOUTHERN DIVISION
NED COMER, et al.
PLAINTIFFS
v.
CAUSE NO. 1:11CV220-LG-RHW
MURPHY OIL USA, INC., et al.
DEFENDANTS
JUDGMENT
This matter came before the Court on the Motion [100] to Dismiss filed by
Hess Corporation, the Motion [207] to Dismiss Amended Complaint filed by Certain
Defendants, the Motion [208] to Dismiss filed by the Coal Company Defendants,
and the Motion [217] to Dismiss filed by Total Petrochemicals USA, Inc., and Total
Gas & Power North America, Inc. The Court, after a full review and consideration
of the Motions, the pleadings on file and the relevant legal authority, finds that in
accord with the Memorandum Opinion and Order entered herewith,
IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that because this Court does not have
jurisdiction over the plaintiffs’ lawsuit and because the plaintiffs have failed to
state a claim upon which relief can be granted, judgment is rendered in favor of the
defendants, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). This
case is hereby DISMISSED.
SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED this the 20th day of March, 2012.
s/
Louis Guirola, Jr.
LOUIS GUIROLA, JR.
CHIEF U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?