Comer et al v. Murphy Oil USA, Inc. et al

Filing 292

JUDGMENT : because this Court does not have jurisdiction over the plaintiffs' lawsuit and because plaintiffs have failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, judgment is rendered in favor of Defendants; this case is dismissed. Signed by Chief District Judge Louis Guirola, Jr on 3/20/2012. (avm)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN DIVISION NED COMER, et al. PLAINTIFFS v. CAUSE NO. 1:11CV220-LG-RHW MURPHY OIL USA, INC., et al. DEFENDANTS JUDGMENT This matter came before the Court on the Motion [100] to Dismiss filed by Hess Corporation, the Motion [207] to Dismiss Amended Complaint filed by Certain Defendants, the Motion [208] to Dismiss filed by the Coal Company Defendants, and the Motion [217] to Dismiss filed by Total Petrochemicals USA, Inc., and Total Gas & Power North America, Inc. The Court, after a full review and consideration of the Motions, the pleadings on file and the relevant legal authority, finds that in accord with the Memorandum Opinion and Order entered herewith, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that because this Court does not have jurisdiction over the plaintiffs’ lawsuit and because the plaintiffs have failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, judgment is rendered in favor of the defendants, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). This case is hereby DISMISSED. SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED this the 20th day of March, 2012. s/ Louis Guirola, Jr. LOUIS GUIROLA, JR. CHIEF U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?