High v. State of Mississippi et al

Filing 15

FINAL JUDGMENT: Ordered that the Plaintiff's claims for habeas corpus relief are dismissed without prejudice. Ordered that the Plaintiff's 1983 claims are dismissed with prejudice as frivolous and for failure to state a claim and as seeking monetary relief against a defendant who is immune from such relief pursuant to 28:1915. The dismissal counts as a strike pursuant to 28:1915(g). Signed by Chief District Judge Louis Guirola, Jr on 11/7/12. (JCH) Modified to add docket text on 11/7/2012 (JCH).

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN DIVISION BILLY CHARLES HIGH PLAINTIFF VERSUS CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:12-cv-201-LG-JMR PEARL RIVER COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ET AL. DEFENDANTS FINAL JUDGMENT This cause is before the Court, sua sponte, for consideration of dismissal. Pursuant to the Memorandum Opinion and Order issued this date and incorporated herein by reference, IT IS, HEREBY, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiff’s claims for habeas corpus relief are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. IT IS, FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiff’s § 1983 claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as frivolous and for failure to state a claim and as seeking monetary relief against a defendant who is immune from such relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i), (ii) and (iii). This dismissal counts as a strike pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED this the 7th day of November, 2012. s/ Louis Guirola, Jr. LOUIS GUIROLA, JR. CHIEF U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?