Stewart v. Allied Barton Security Services et al

Filing 58

JUDGMENT in favor of Allied Barton Security Services, Singing River Mall LLC against Edward Stewart. This case is dismissed with prejudice. The defendants are entitled to recover costs from the plaintiff. Signed by Chief District Judge Louis Guirola, Jr. on 3/5/14. (RLW)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
SOUTHERN DIVISION
EDWARD STEWART

PLAINTIFF

v.

CAUSE NO. 1:13CV95-LG-JMR

ALLIEDBARTON SECURITY SERVICES
and SINGING RIVER MALL, LLC

DEFENDANTS

JUDGMENT
This matter having come on to be heard on the Motion for Summary
Judgment [38] filed by Singing River Mall, LLC, and the Motion for Summary
Judgment [40] filed by AlliedBarton Security Services, the Court, after a full review
and consideration of the defendants’ Motions, the pleadings on file and the relevant
legal authority, finds that in accord with the Memorandum Opinion and Order
entered herein,
IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that because there is no genuine issue
as to any material fact, judgment is rendered in favor of AlliedBarton Security
Services and Singing River Mall, LLC, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 56. This case is
hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. In accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P.
54(d)(1), the defendants are entitled to recover costs from the plaintiff.
SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED this the 5th day of March, 2014.
s/

Louis Guirola, Jr.

LOUIS GUIROLA, JR.
CHIEF U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE