Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Movers, Inc. et al
Filing
16
JUDGMENT/ORDER granting 15 Motion for Default Judgment. Ordered that Judgment is entered against separate Defendants, The Movers, Inc. and Cynthia J. Wing, individually, jointly and serverally, and in favor of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., in the amount of $177,650.85 with interest to accrue in accord with the Note at a rate of 7.17% ($33.53 per diem) until paid in full. Signed by District Judge Halil S. Ozerden on 9/19/13. (RLW)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
SOUTHERN DIVISION
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
vs.
PLAINTIFF
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:13 cv00247-HSO-RHW
THE MOVERS, INC.; CYNTHIA J. WING;
and JOSEPH A. JONES
DEFENDANTS
JUDGMENT
BE IT REMEMBERED that this matter came before the Court on the WELLS FARGO
BANK, N.A., (“Wells Fargo”), Renewed Motion for Default Judgment as to two (2) of the
Defendants: THE MOVERS, INC., and MS. CYNTHIA J. WING, individually. Finding that this Court
has both subject matter jurisdiction and personal jurisdiction over this action, the Court finds that
said motion is well taken.
IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that JUDGMENT is hereby entered against
separate Defendants, The Movers, Inc., and Cynthia J. Wing, individually, jointly and severally,
and in favor of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., in the amount of $177,650.85 with interest to accrue in
accord with the Note at a rate of 7.17% ($33.53 per diem) until paid in full.
SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED this 19th day of September, 2013.
s/ Halil Suleyman Ozerden
HALIL SULEYMAN OZERDEN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
SUBMITTED BY:
s/Stephen F. Schelver
G. Dewey Hembree, III (MSB No. 2247)
Stephen F. Schelver (MSB No. 101889)
McGlinchey Stafford, PLLC
Post Office Drawer 22949
Jackson, Mississippi 39225-2949
Telephone: (769) 524-2300
Facsimile: (769) 524-2331
ghembree@mcglinchey.com
sschelver@mcglinchey.com
Attorneys for Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?