Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Movers, Inc. et al

Filing 16

JUDGMENT/ORDER granting 15 Motion for Default Judgment. Ordered that Judgment is entered against separate Defendants, The Movers, Inc. and Cynthia J. Wing, individually, jointly and serverally, and in favor of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., in the amount of $177,650.85 with interest to accrue in accord with the Note at a rate of 7.17% ($33.53 per diem) until paid in full. Signed by District Judge Halil S. Ozerden on 9/19/13. (RLW)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN DIVISION WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. vs. PLAINTIFF CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:13 cv00247-HSO-RHW THE MOVERS, INC.; CYNTHIA J. WING; and JOSEPH A. JONES DEFENDANTS JUDGMENT BE IT REMEMBERED that this matter came before the Court on the WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., (“Wells Fargo”), Renewed Motion for Default Judgment as to two (2) of the Defendants: THE MOVERS, INC., and MS. CYNTHIA J. WING, individually. Finding that this Court has both subject matter jurisdiction and personal jurisdiction over this action, the Court finds that said motion is well taken. IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that JUDGMENT is hereby entered against separate Defendants, The Movers, Inc., and Cynthia J. Wing, individually, jointly and severally, and in favor of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., in the amount of $177,650.85 with interest to accrue in accord with the Note at a rate of 7.17% ($33.53 per diem) until paid in full. SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED this 19th day of September, 2013. s/ Halil Suleyman Ozerden HALIL SULEYMAN OZERDEN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE SUBMITTED BY: s/Stephen F. Schelver G. Dewey Hembree, III (MSB No. 2247) Stephen F. Schelver (MSB No. 101889) McGlinchey Stafford, PLLC Post Office Drawer 22949 Jackson, Mississippi 39225-2949 Telephone: (769) 524-2300 Facsimile: (769) 524-2331 ghembree@mcglinchey.com sschelver@mcglinchey.com Attorneys for Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?