Davis v. Davis
Filing
26
FINAL JUDGMENT: Ordered that petitioner Eric Davis's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is denied and dismissed with prejudice; and a certificate of appealability is denied. Signed by Honorable David C. Bramlette, III on 11/6/14 (RLW)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
SOUTHERN DIVISION
ERIC DAVIS
PETITIONER
VS.
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:13-cv-484(DCB)(MTP)
HUBERT DAVIS
RESPONDENT
FINAL JUDGMENT
This cause having come on to be heard on this date upon the
Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge
entered in this cause, and the Court, after a full review of the
record, having adopted said Report and Recommendation as the
findings
of
this
Court
by
Order
dated
this
day,
finds
that
petitioner Eric Davis’s Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus under
28 U.S.C. § 2254 is denied and dismissed with prejudice.
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 22(b), Rule
11(a) of the Rules Governing §§ 2254 and 2255 proceedings, and 28
U.S.C. § 2253(c), the Court further finds that the petitioner has
failed to show (1) that reasonable jurists would find this Court’s
“assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong,” or
(2) that reasonable jurists would find “it debatable whether the
petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional
right” and “debatable whether [this Court] was correct in its
procedural ruling.”
1
Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000).1
Rule 11 of the Rules Governing §§ 2254 and 2255 Cases, as
amended effective on December 1, 2009, reads as follows:
The Court therefore denies a certificate of appealability.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that petitioner Eric
Davis’s Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254
is DENIED and dismissed with prejudice.
FURTHER
ORDERED
AND
ADJUDGED
that
a
certificate
of
appealability is DENIED.
SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED, this the 6th day of November, 2014.
/s/ David Bramlette
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
(a) Certificate of Appealability. The district court
must issue or deny a certificate of appealability when
it enters a final order adverse to the applicant.
Before entering the final order, the court may direct
the parties to submit arguments on whether a
certificate should issue. If the court issues a
certificate, the court must state the specific issue or
issues that satisfy the showing required by 28 U.S.C. §
2253(c)(2). If the court denies a certificate, the
parties may not appeal the denial but may seek a
certificate from the court of appeals under Federal
Rule of Appellate Procedure 22. A motion to reconsider
a denial does not extend the time to appeal.
(b) Time to Appeal. Federal Rule of Appellate
Procedure 4(a) governs the time to appeal an order
entered under these rules. A timely notice of appeal
must be filed even if the district court issues a
certificate of appealability.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?