Bosarge v. Epps et al

Filing 56

ORDER RESCINDING re 33 Order Reassigning Case Upon Consent. The Clerk is directed to reassign this case to the appropriate District Judge. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on 7/30/15 (RLW)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN DIVISION JERRY ALLEN BOSARGE VS. CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:13cv564-MTP CHIQUITA BROWN, ET AL ORDER RESCINDING [33] ORDER REASSIGNING CASE UPON CONSENT BE IT REMEMBERED that on December 2, 2014, an [33] Order Reassigning Case Upon Consent was entered in the above styled and numbered cause; and THAT all original parties in this action consented [30] to the jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge; and THAT Defendants Everett and Valley Food Service were added to the case after said [33] Order of Reassignment was entered; and THAT said Defendants Everett and Valley Food Service were directed by the Magistrate Judge, in [54] Order dated July 20, 2015, to notify the Court in writing whether they consent to jurisdiction by the Magistrate Judge on or before July 24, 2015; and THAT said date has now passed and Defendants Everett and Valley Food Service have failed notify the Court of their consent; and THAT because all parties now in this action have not consented to jurisdiction by the Magistrate Judge, said [33] Order Reassigning Case Upon Consent should be rescinded and held for naught and this case shall be returned to the jurisdiction of the District Judge and the Magistrate Judge. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the [33] Order of Reassignment Upon Consent in the above styled and numbered cause be and the same is hereby rescinded and held for naught and the Clerk of this Court is directed to reassign this case to the appropriate District Judge. SO ORDERED on this the 30th day of July, 2015. s/Keith Starrett UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?