Bosarge v. Epps et al
Filing
56
ORDER RESCINDING re 33 Order Reassigning Case Upon Consent. The Clerk is directed to reassign this case to the appropriate District Judge. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on 7/30/15 (RLW)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
SOUTHERN DIVISION
JERRY ALLEN BOSARGE
VS.
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:13cv564-MTP
CHIQUITA BROWN, ET AL
ORDER RESCINDING [33] ORDER REASSIGNING CASE UPON CONSENT
BE IT REMEMBERED that on December 2, 2014, an [33] Order Reassigning Case
Upon Consent was entered in the above styled and numbered cause; and
THAT all original parties in this action consented [30] to the jurisdiction of the
Magistrate Judge; and
THAT Defendants Everett and Valley Food Service were added to the case after said [33]
Order of Reassignment was entered; and
THAT said Defendants Everett and Valley Food Service were directed by the Magistrate
Judge, in [54] Order dated July 20, 2015, to notify the Court in writing whether they consent to
jurisdiction by the Magistrate Judge on or before July 24, 2015; and
THAT said date has now passed and Defendants Everett and Valley Food Service have
failed notify the Court of their consent; and
THAT because all parties now in this action have not consented to jurisdiction by the
Magistrate Judge, said [33] Order Reassigning Case Upon Consent should be rescinded and held
for naught and this case shall be returned to the jurisdiction of the District Judge and the
Magistrate Judge.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the [33] Order of Reassignment
Upon Consent in the above styled and numbered cause be and the same is hereby rescinded and
held for naught and the Clerk of this Court is directed to reassign this case to the appropriate
District Judge.
SO ORDERED on this the 30th day of July, 2015.
s/Keith Starrett
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?