Rybar v. Corporate Management, Inc.
Filing
65
FINAL JUDGMENT ON JURY VERDICT: Ordered that the Complaint of Plaintiff is dismissed with prejudice, and Plaintiff is taxed with costs, for all of which let execution issue. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on 8/10/15. (RLW)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
SOUTHERN DIVISION
ANGELIQUE C. RYBAR
VS.
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:14cv242-KS-MTP
CORPORATE MANAGEMENT, INC.
FINAL JUDGMENT ON JURY VERDICT
This cause having come on to be heard in open Court on August 3, 2015 through August
5, 2015, and the Court having jurisdiction of the parties and the subject matter, and all parties
having personally appeared and by their counsel announced ready for trial, there came a jury of
eight (8) good and lawful men and women, who, being duly qualified, sworn and empaneled,
did hear the evidence and arguments of counsel and received instructions of the Court and who
then retired to consider their verdict, and who thereupon returned into open Court with the
following unanimous verdict, to-wit:
“Has Plaintiff, Angelique Rybar, proven by a preponderance of the evidence that she
would not have been terminated but for her rejection of her supervisor, Ted Cain’s, sexual
advances, requests, or demands, if any?
Answer “YES” or “NO”
NO
If you answered “YES,” proceed to Question #2. If you answered “NO,” then you are
finished.”
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Complaint of Plaintiff,
Angelique C. Rybar, be and the same is hereby, dismissed with prejudice, and the Plaintiff is
hereby taxed with costs, for all of which let execution issue.
SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED on this, the 10th day of August, 2015.
s/Keith Starrett
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?