Merchants Bonding Company v. Howell et al

Filing 35

AGREED ORDER DISMISSING CASE: This matter has settled and is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Chief District Judge Louis Guirola, Jr. on 5/27/15 (RLW)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN DIVISION MERCHANTS BONDING COMPANY VS. PLAINTIFF CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:14cv352LG-RHW NORMA R. HOWELL and NRH ENTERPRISES, LLC DEFENDANTS DEFENDANT AGREED ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE THIS DAY THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the joint motion of the parties, ore tenus, to dismiss this action, WITHOUT prejudice, and the parties having announced that these matters have been fully compromised and settled and that there remain no issues to be litigated by or between the parties, nor adjudicated or determined by the Court, and all parties have consented to the entry of this Agreed Order of Dismissal Without Prejudice, and agree that this action should be dismissed without prejudice. The Court being further advised in the premises finds that the Motion to dismiss this action without prejudice is well-taken and should be sustained. IT IS, THEREFORE, HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this action be and the same hereby is dismissed WITHOUT prejudice. SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED, THIS the 27th day of May, 2015. Louis Guirola, Jr. s/ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE AGREED AND APPROVED BY: /s Alec M. Taylor ALEC M. TAYLOR (MSB# 102874) KREBS FARLEY & PELLETERI, PLLC One Jackson Place, Suite 900 188 East Capitol Street Jackson, Mississippi 39201 601/968-6710 601/968-6708 (facsimile) ataylor@kfplaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiff /s Jeffrey G. Pierce Jeffrey G. Pierce, Esq. (MSB #99465) Law Office of Jeffrey G. Pierce, PLLC Post Office Box 1266 Lucedale, Mississippi 39452-1366 601/766-9105 601/766-9108 (facsimile) jeffrey.piercelaw@gmail.com Attorney for Defendants -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?