Bradshaw v. Hood
Filing
11
Certificate of Appealability Denied. The applicant has failed to make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. Signed by District Judge Halil S. Ozerden on 1/28/15. (RLW)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
SOUTHERN DIVISION
BRIAN DAVID BRADSHAW, #174849
VERSUS
PETITIONER
CIVIL NO. 1:14-CV-445-HSO-RHW
JIM HOOD, Attorney General
for the State of Mississippi
RESPONDENT
CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY
A final order adverse to the Petitioner having been filed in the captioned habeas
corpus case filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, the Court, considering the record in the
case and the requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 2253, Rule 22(b) of the Federal Rules of
Appellate Procedure, and Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the
United States District Courts, hereby finds that:
X
A Certificate of Appealability should not issue. The applicant has
failed to make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional
right.
A Certificate of Appealability should issue for the following specific
issue(s):
SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED, this the 28th day of January, 2015.
s/ Halil Suleyman Ozerden
HALIL SULEYMAN OZERDEN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?