Bradshaw v. Hood

Filing 11

Certificate of Appealability Denied. The applicant has failed to make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. Signed by District Judge Halil S. Ozerden on 1/28/15. (RLW)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
SOUTHERN DIVISION
BRIAN DAVID BRADSHAW, #174849
VERSUS

PETITIONER
CIVIL NO. 1:14-CV-445-HSO-RHW

JIM HOOD, Attorney General
for the State of Mississippi

RESPONDENT

CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY
A final order adverse to the Petitioner having been filed in the captioned habeas
corpus case filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, the Court, considering the record in the
case and the requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 2253, Rule 22(b) of the Federal Rules of
Appellate Procedure, and Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the
United States District Courts, hereby finds that:
X

A Certificate of Appealability should not issue. The applicant has
failed to make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional
right.
A Certificate of Appealability should issue for the following specific
issue(s):

SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED, this the 28th day of January, 2015.

s/ Halil Suleyman Ozerden
HALIL SULEYMAN OZERDEN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE