Drury v. Singing River Health System et al

Filing 7

AGREDD ORDER granting 2 Motion to Remand to State Court. Ordered that a certified copy of this order of remand shall be immediately mailed by the Clerk of this Court to the clerk of the state court. Signed by Chief District Judge Louis Guirola, Jr. on 2/3/15. (RLW)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN DIVISION RALPH DRURY PLAINTIFF v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:15cv2-LG-RHW SINGING RIVER HEALTH SYSTEM, et al. DEFENDANTS AGREED ORDER TO REMAND THIS DAY this cause having come on for hearing on the Motion [2] of Plaintiff to remand this cause of action to the Chancery Court of Jackson County, Mississippi, and Defendants having no objection and agreeing to same, and the Court being fully advised of the premises is of the opinion that said motion is well taken and should be granted. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand [2] is hereby GRANTED. IT IS, FURTHER, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that a certified copy of this order of remand shall be immediately mailed by the Clerk of this Court to the clerk of the state court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c). SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED this the 3rd day of February, 2015. s/ Louis Guirola, Jr. Louis Guirola, Jr. Chief United States District Judge Page 1 of 2 AGREED TO BY: /s/W. HARVEY BARTON, MSB #2104 Attorney for Plaintiff /s/EARL L. DENHAM, MSB #6047 Attorney for Plaintiff /s/BRETT K. WILLIAMS, MSB # 7224 Attorney for Defendants Singing River Health System, Lawrence Cosper, Allen Cronier, Michael Heidelberg, Kevin Holland, Tommy Leonard, Ira Polk, and Morris Strickland /s/ STEPHEN G. PERESICH, MSB #4114 Attorney for Defendant Hugo Quintana /s/JOHN L. HUNTER, MSB #2913 Attorney for Michael Tolleson /s/JOHN A. BANAHAN, MSB #1731 Attorney for Defendant Stephen Nunenmacher Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?