Garcia v. Fickling Management Services, LLC

Filing 60

ORDER REGARDING OBJECTIONS TO DEPOSITION TESTIMONY. Signed by Chief District Judge Louis Guirola, Jr., on 12/16/2016. (BR)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN DIVISION LINDA GARCIA v. PLAINTIFF CAUSE NO. 1:15CV51-LG-RHW FICKLING MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LLC DEFENDANT ORDER REGARDING OBJECTIONS TO DEPOSITION TESTIMONY Having reviewed the objections of the parties to the deposition testimony sought to be offered at the trial of this action and submitted to this Court, as well as any responses thereto, the Court finds as follows: There are no objections to the deposition testimony of Dr. Eric Wolfson. The Court addresses the parties’ specific objections to the deposition testimony of Dr. Arthur D. Black below. DEFENDANT’S OBJECTIONS TO THE DEPOSITION TESTIMONY OF DR. ARTHUR D. BLACK: Page 83, Lines 19-25: Defendant objects to this testimony, claiming that the question is leading. Plaintiff concedes this objection, and therefore, it is SUSTAINED. Page 84, Lines 1-14: Defendant objects to this testimony, because it claims that the question is leading. Plaintiff responds that she is not offering the subject testimony. Therefore, the objection is MOOT. Page 84, Lines 22-23: Defendant objects to this testimony, because it argues that the question is leading. Plaintiff disputes Defendant’s classification of the question. The Court finds that the question is not leading, and therefore, the objection is OVERRULED. SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED this the 16th day of December, 2016. s/ Louis Guirola, Jr. Louis Guirola, Jr. Chief United States District Judge -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?