Blair v. Atlantic Scaffolding Company, LLC et al
Filing
125
JUDGMENT/ORDER granting 124 Motion to Dismiss. Defendants are dismissed with prejudice, along with all remaining claims of the Plaintiff, with each party to bear their own costs. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on 1/30/17. (RLW)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
SOUTHERN DIVISION
TERRANCE BLAIR
:
Plaintiff,
:
v.
:
ATLANTIC SCAFFOLDING CO.,
LLC; et al.,
:
Defendants.
NO. 1:15-CV-00162-KS-RHW
:
JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
THIS CAUSE having come on for hearing on the Joint Motion to Dismiss of Plaintiff,
TERRANCE BLAIR, and Defendants, ATLANTIC SCAFFOLDING COMPANY, ATLANTIC
SCAFFOLDING COMPANY, LLC, and BROCK SERVICES, LLC, for a dismissal of
Defendants,
ATLANTIC
SCAFFOLDING
COMPANY,
ATLANTIC
SCAFFOLDING
COMPANY, LLC, and BROCK SERVICES, LLC, from this cause with prejudice, and the
Court, being advised that the parties have reached an agreement as to a resolution of all
remaining claims, and that there remain no issues to be decided between the parties, is of the
opinion that said Motion should be sustained and that Defendants, ATLANTIC SCAFFOLDING
COMPANY, ATLANTIC SCAFFOLDING COMPANY, LLC, and BROCK SERVICES, LLC
should be dismissed with prejudice. It is therefore,
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Defendants, ATLANTIC SCAFFOLDING
COMPANY, ATLANTIC SCAFFOLDING COMPANY, LLC, and BROCK SERVICES, LLC,
are hereby dismissed with prejudice, along with all remaining claims of the Plaintiff herein, with
each party to bear their own costs.
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED this the
{03885667.1}
30th
day of January, 2017.
s/Keith Starrett_________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT AND FORM:
/s/ Jonathan E. Sholtis
JONATHAN E. SHOLTIS, MSB #99866
Attorney for Plaintiff
{03885667.1}
/s/ H. Finn Cox, Jr.
H. FINN COX, JR., MSB # 104750
Attorney for Atlantic Scaffolding Company,
Atlantic Scaffolding Company, LLC, and
Brock Services, LLC
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?