Cruse v. Brisolara et al

Filing 122

FINAL JUDGMENT: Ordered that this case is dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted due to Plaintiffs failure to exhaust administrative remedies, and is to count as a strike. In the alternative only, the case is dismissed for Plaintiffs failure to set forth specific facts showing there is a genuine issue for trial. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert H. Walker on 9/16/16. (RLW)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
SOUTHERN DIVISION
ANDREW CLINTON CRUSE, JR.
VERSUS

PLAINTIFF
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:15cv172-RHW

MELVIN T. BRISOLARA, et al.

DEFENDANTS
FINAL JUDGMENT

In accordance with the requirement for a separate document by Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure 58(a) and based on the reasons set forth in the Memorandum Opinion entered by the
Court this date, the Court hereby enters its Final Judgment in the above-captioned matter.
It is ordered that this case is dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be
granted due to Plaintiff’s failure to exhaust administrative remedies, and is to count as a strike.
In the alternative only, the case is dismissed for Plaintiff’s failure to set forth specific
facts showing there is a genuine issue for trial.
SO ORDERED, this the 16th day of September, 2016.

/s/

Robert H. Walker

ROBERT H. WALKER
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE