Stahl v. Jackson County Mississippi et al

Filing 15

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 7 Motion to Dismiss. Defendant Mike Byrd is dismissed from this case in his official capacity. Byrd remains a defendant in his individual capacity. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on 12/18/2015 (scp)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN DIVISION JOHN STAHL v. PLAINTIFF CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:15-CV-189-KS-MTP JACKSON COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI, MIKE BYRD (in his official and individual capacity) and OTHER UNKNOWN JOHN and JANE DOES, A-Z, (also in their official and individual capacities) DEFENDANTS MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on the Motion to Dismiss [7] filed by Defendant Mike Byrd (“Byrd”), in his official capacity. Having considered the submissions of the parties, the record, and the applicable law, the Court finds this motion to be well taken and should be granted. Byrd claims that the claims against him in his official capacity are duplicative of the claims pending against Jackson County, Mississippi (“Jackson County”), also named as a defendant in this case, and should be dismissed as redundant. It is well established that suits against government officials in their official capacity “generally represent only another way of pleading an action against an entity of which an officer is an agent.” Kentucky v. Graham, 473 U.S. 159, 165-66, 105 S. Ct. 3099, 87 L.Ed.2d 114 (1985) (quoting Monell v. N.Y.C. Dept. of Soc. Servs., 436 U.S. 658, 690, n.55, 98 S. Ct. 2018, 56 L.Ed.2d 611 (1978)). Therefore, Plaintiff’s claims against Byrd in his official capacity as the former Sheriff of Jackson County, Mississippi, are in actuality claims against Jackson County, Mississippi. These claims are duplicative of the claims Plaintiff brings against Jackson County, and should be dismissed as redundant. The Court will therefore grant Byrd’s Motion to Dismiss [7] and dismiss him from this case in his official capacity. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Byrd’s Motion to Dismiss [7] is granted. Byrd will be dismissed in his official capacity as a defendant in this case. Byrd remains a defendant in this case in his individual capacity. SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED this the 18th day of December, 2015. s/ Keith Starrett UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?