White v. Banks et al

Filing 49

FINAL JUDGMENT: Ordered that the Plaintiff's claim regarding an alleged denial of a religious diet is dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. Ordered that Plaintiff's claims regarding theft of personal pr operty, MDOC's grooming policy, the RVR's issued by Officer Smith, and the intra-prison transfer are dismissed with prejudice because they are frivolous. Dismissal of this action counts as a strike. Signed by Magistrate Judge John C. Gargiulo on 9/6/17. (JCH)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
SOUTHERN DIVISION
TOMMY DEMINTO WHITE, #84837
V.

PLAINTIFF
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:16-cv-101-JCG

JAQUELINE BANKS, MARSHALL
TURNER, HUBERT DAVIS,
TIMOTHY BARNES, KENNETH
POWELL, ADRIAN KEYS,
CHRISTOPHER WOOLMAN,
THOMAS BYRD, REGINA REED, and
ANTHONY BEASLEY
FINAL JUDGMENT

DEFENDANTS

In accordance with the Court’s Memorandum Opinion and Order Granting
Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment, final judgment is hereby entered in
favor of Defendants pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiff’s claim
regarding an alleged denial of a religious diet is DISMISSED WITHOUT
PREJUDICE for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. Plaintiff’s claims
regarding theft of personal property, MDOC’s grooming policy, the RVRs issued by
Officer Smith, and the intra-prison transfer are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE
because they are frivolous. Dismissal of this action counts as a strike pursuant to 42
U.S.C. § 1997e(e).
SO ORDERED this the 6th day of September, 2017.

s/ John C. Gargiulo

JOHN C. GARGIULO
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE