Edmonson v. MDOC

Filing 14

FINAL JUDGMENT: Ordered that Edmonson's habeas corpus claims are dismissed without prejudice; that Edmonson's § 1983 claims are dismissed with prejudice as frivolous and for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (e)(2)(B)(i)-(ii); that this dismissal will count as a strike in accordance with the Prison Litigation Reform Act. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (g); and that any state law claims Edmonson may be asserting in this action are dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Chief District Judge Louis Guirola, Jr. on 4/14/17. (RLW)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
SOUTHERN DIVISION
WILLIAM RANDALL EDMONSON, JR., #K9606
v.

PLAINTIFF

CAUSE NO. 1:16-cv-335-LG-RHW

KENNY WOO, LISA HERNDON,
LAURA TILLEY, JUARITA EVANS,
ANDREW MILLS, TIMOTHY BARNES,
J. BANKS, and MARSHALL FISHER

DEFENDANTS

FINAL JUDGMENT
Pursuant to the Memorandum Opinion and Order issued this date and incorporated
herein by reference,
IT IS, HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Edmonson’s habeas corpus
claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
IT IS, FURTHER, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Edmonson’s § 1983 claims
are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as frivolous and for failure to state a claim upon
which relief may be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (e)(2)(B)(i)-(ii)
IT IS, FURTHER, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this dismissal will count as
a “strike” in accordance with the Prison Litigation Reform Act. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (g).
IT IS, FURTHER, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that any state law claims
Edmonson may be asserting in this action are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED this the 14th day of April, 2017.

Louis Guirola, Jr. 

s/ 

Louis Guirola, Jr.
Chief U.S. District Judge