Craig v. Lorraine et al

Filing 18

FINAL JUDGMENT: Ordered that this case is dismissed with prejudice. Ordered that any habeas corpus claims asserted in this civil action are dismissed without prejudice to Plaintiff's pursuit of these claims in his pending habeas corpus case, 1:16cv371 LG-FKB. Ordered that the dismissal will count as a "strike" in accordance with the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Signed by Chief District Judge Louis Guirola, Jr on 1/23/17. (JCH)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN DIVISION HENRY LEE CRAIG, #76582 PLAINTIFF v. CAUSE NO. 1:16-cv-373-LG-RHW JEROME LORRAINE, LOUIE MILLER and JAMES B. COMEY DEFENDANTS FINAL JUDGMENT Pursuant to the Memorandum Opinion and Order issued this date and incorporated herein by reference, IT IS, HEREBY, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (e)(2)(B). IT IS, FURTHER, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that any habeas corpus claims asserted in this civil action are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to Plaintiff’s pursuit of these claims in his pending habeas corpus case, Craig v. MDOC, no. 1:16-cv-371-LG-FKB (S.D. Miss.). IT IS, FURTHER, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this dismissal will count as a “strike” in accordance with the Prison Litigation Reform Act. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (g). SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED this the 23rd day of January, 2017. s/ Louis Guirola, Jr. LOUIS GUIROLA, JR. CHIEF U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?