Craig v. Lorraine et al

Filing 18

FINAL JUDGMENT: Ordered that this case is dismissed with prejudice. Ordered that any habeas corpus claims asserted in this civil action are dismissed without prejudice to Plaintiff's pursuit of these claims in his pending habeas corpus case, 1:16cv371 LG-FKB. Ordered that the dismissal will count as a "strike" in accordance with the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Signed by Chief District Judge Louis Guirola, Jr on 1/23/17. (JCH)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
SOUTHERN DIVISION
HENRY LEE CRAIG, #76582

PLAINTIFF

v.

CAUSE NO. 1:16-cv-373-LG-RHW

JEROME LORRAINE,
LOUIE MILLER and
JAMES B. COMEY

DEFENDANTS
FINAL JUDGMENT

Pursuant to the Memorandum Opinion and Order issued this date and
incorporated herein by reference,
IT IS, HEREBY, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this case is
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915
(e)(2)(B).
IT IS, FURTHER, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that any habeas corpus
claims asserted in this civil action are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to
Plaintiff’s pursuit of these claims in his pending habeas corpus case, Craig v.
MDOC, no. 1:16-cv-371-LG-FKB (S.D. Miss.).
IT IS, FURTHER, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this dismissal will
count as a “strike” in accordance with the Prison Litigation Reform Act. See 28
U.S.C. § 1915 (g).
SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED this the 23rd day of January, 2017.
s/

Louis Guirola, Jr.

LOUIS GUIROLA, JR.
CHIEF U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE