Craig v. Lawrence et al

Filing 16

FINAL JUDGMENT: Ordered that this civil action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as frivolous; that any habeas corpus claims asserted in this civil action are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to Plaintiffs pursuit of these claims in his pending habeas corpus case, Craig v. MDOC, Civil No. 1:16-cv-371-LG-FKB (S.D. Miss.); and that this dismissal will count as a strike. Signed by District Judge Halil S. Ozerden on 1/20/17. (RLW)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN DIVISION HENRY LEE CRAIG, #76582 v. PLAINTIFF CIVIL NO. 1:16-cv-375-HSO- JCG ANTHONY LAWRENCE, III., ANGEL MEYERS, BOBBY KNOCHEL, and KATHY KING JACKSON DEFENDANTS FINAL JUDGMENT This matter is before the Court sua sponte. The Court, after a full review and consideration of the record in this case and relevant legal authority, finds that in accordance with its Memorandum Opinion and Order entered herewith, IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this civil action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (e)(2)(B). IT IS, FURTHER, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that any habeas corpus claims asserted in this civil action are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to Plaintiff’s pursuit of these claims in his pending habeas corpus case, Craig v. MDOC, Civil No. 1:16-cv-371-LG-FKB (S.D. Miss.). IT IS, FURTHER, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this dismissal will count as a “strike” in accordance with the Prison Litigation Reform Act. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (g). SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED, this the 20th day of January, 2017. s/ Halil Suleyman Ozerden HALIL SULEYMAN OZERDEN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?