Craig v. Taylor et al
FINAL JUDGMENT: case is dismissed as frivolous. Any habeas corpus claims asserted are dismissed without prejudice to Plaintiff's pursuit of these claims in his pending habeas corpus case, 1:16cv371LG-FKB. This dismissal will count as a "strike" in accordance with the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Signed by Chief District Judge Louis Guirola, Jr. on 4/4/2017 (wld)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
HENRY LEE CRAIG, #76582
CAUSE NO. 1:16-cv-407-LG-RHW
ANTHONY LAWRENCE, III,
ANGEL MEYERS, BOBBY KNOCHEL,
and KATHY KING JACKSON
Pursuant to the Memorandum Opinion and Order issued this date and
incorporated herein by reference,
IT IS, HEREBY, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this case is
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (e)(2)(B).
IT IS, FURTHER, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that any habeas corpus
claims asserted in this civil action are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to
Plaintiff’s pursuit of these claims in his pending habeas corpus case, Craig v. MDOC,
no. 1:16-cv-371-LG-FKB (S.D. Miss.).
IT IS, FURTHER, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this dismissal will
count as a “strike” in accordance with the Prison Litigation Reform Act. See 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915 (g).
SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED this the 4th day of April, 2017.
Louis Guirola, Jr.
LOUIS GUIROLA, JR.
CHIEF U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?