Craig v. Jackson et al
FINAL JUDGMENT: Ordered that this civil action is dismissed with prejudice as frivolous. Ordered that any habeas corpus claims asserted in this civil action are dismissed without prejudice to Plaintiff's pursuit of these claims in his pending habeas corpus case, 1:16cv371 LG-FKB. Ordered that this dismissal will count as a "strike" in accordance with the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Signed by District Judge Halil S. Ozerden on 1/24/17. (JCH)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
HENRY LEE CRAIG, #76582
CIVIL NO. 1:16-cv-421-HSO-JCG
KATHY KING JACKSON, ET AL.
This matter is before the Court sua sponte. The Court, after a full review
and consideration of the record in this case and relevant legal authority, finds that
in accordance with its Memorandum Opinion and Order entered herewith,
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this civil action
is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §
IT IS, FURTHER, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that any habeas corpus
claims asserted in this civil action are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to
Plaintiff’s pursuit of these claims in his pending habeas corpus case, Craig v.
MDOC, no. 1:16-cv-371-LG-FKB (S.D. Miss. filed Oct. 17, 2016).
IT IS, FURTHER, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this dismissal will
count as a “strike” in accordance with the Prison Litigation Reform Act. See 28
U.S.C. § 1915(g).
SO ORDERED this the 24th day of January, 2017.
s/ Halil Suleyman Ozerden
HALIL SULEYMAN OZERDEN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?