Pettaway v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP et al

Filing 45

JUDGMENT in favor of Wal-Mart Stores East, LP against Darrell Pettaway. Ordered that because there is no genuine issue as to any material fact, judgment is rendered in favor of Wal-Mart Stores East, LP. Darrell Pettaways claims against Wal-Mart St ores East, LP are dismissed with prejudice; and that Darrell Pettaways claims against John Does 1-5 are dismissed without prejudice, because the deadline for naming these parties has expired. Signed by District Judge Louis Guirola, Jr. on 3/15/18. (RLW)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
SOUTHERN DIVISION
DARRELL PETTAWAY

PLAINTIFF

v.

CAUSE NO. 1:17CV5-LG-RHW

WAL-MART STORES EAST,
LP and JOHN DOES 1-5

DEFENDANTS
JUDGMENT

This matter having come on to be heard on the Motion for Summary
Judgment [37] filed by the defendant Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, the Court, after a
full review and consideration of the Motion, the pleadings on file and the relevant
legal authority, finds that in accord with the Memorandum Opinion and Order
entered herein,
IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that because there is no genuine issue
as to any material fact, judgment is rendered in favor of Wal-Mart Stores East, LP.
Darrell Pettaway’s claims against Wal-Mart Stores East, LP are hereby
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
IT IS, FURTHER, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Darrell Pettaway’s
claims against John Does 1-5 are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, because
the deadline for naming these parties has expired.
SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED this the 15th day of March, 2018.

s/

Louis Guirola, Jr.

LOUIS GUIROLA, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE