Allen et al v. Taishan Gypsum Co., Ltd. et al

Filing 36

ORDER re 32 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Dolly Lott, Dolly Punch, Dwayne Punch, Sanjay Patel, Rhonda Pruitt, Sharoj Patel, Troyce Pruitt. The plaintiffs' claims against Beijing New Building Materials (Group) Co., Ltd., Beijing New Building Materials Public Limited Co., and China National Building Material Co., Ltd. are hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by District Judge Louis Guirola, Jr., on 11/30/2020. (BR)

Download PDF
Case 1:17-cv-00217-LG-RPM Document 36 Filed 11/30/20 Page 1 of 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN DIVISION DOLLY LOTT, et al., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated PLAINTIFFS v. CAUSE NO. 1:17cv217-LG-RPM TAISHAN GYPSUM CO., LTD, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER DISMISSING PLAINTIFFS’ CLAIMS AGAINST CERTAIN DEFENDANTS PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 41(a)(2) BEFORE THE COURT is the [32] Notice of Voluntary Dismissal filed by the plaintiffs. The plaintiffs wish to dismiss their claims against the following defendants without prejudice: (1) Beijing New Building Materials (Group) Co., Ltd., (2) Beijing New Building Materials Public Limited Co., and (3) China National Building Material Co., Ltd. After reviewing the Notice of Voluntary Dismissal and the [35] Amended Complaint that excludes these defendants, the Court finds that the plaintiffs’ claims against these defendants should be dismissed without prejudice. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the plaintiffs’ claims against Beijing New Building Materials (Group) Co., Ltd., Beijing New Building Materials Public Limited Co., and China National Building Material Co., Ltd. are hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the plaintiffs claims against all other defendants shall remain pending at this time. SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED this the 30th day of November, 2020. s/ Louis Guirola, Jr. Louis Guirola, Jr. United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?