McGee v. Centurion Medical Services et al
Filing
22
ORDER denying 20 Motion for Enjoinment. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert H. Walker on 12/12/17. (RLW)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
SOUTHERN DIVISION
CHARLES L. MCGEE, #L7157
PLAINTIFF
VERSUS
CIVIL ACTION NO.
CENTURION MEDICAL SERVICES, et al.
1:17-cv-224-LG-RHW
DEFENDANTS
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION [20] FOR ENJOINMENT
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion [20] entitled “Motion for
Enjoinment.”
Plaintiff is requesting “this Honorable Court [] consider the enjoinment of all
issues in civil action McGee v. Krebs[,] 1:15-cv-65-LG-RHW into civil action McGee v.
Centurion[,] 1:17-cv-224-LG-RHW.” Pl.’ s Mot. [20] at 1.
As discussed below, Plaintiff’s
Motion [20] will be denied.
A review of McGee v. Krebs, et al., No. 1:15-cv-65-LG-RHW (S.D. Miss Nov. 18, 2015),
reveals that civil action is no longer pending. A Final Judgment was entered on November 18,
2015, dismissing the habeas claims without prejudice and dismissing the § 1983 claims as
frivolous, for failure to state a claim, and dismissing certain Defendants as being immune from
liability. See McGee v. Krebs, et al., No. 1:15-cv-65-LG-RHW (S.D. Miss Nov. 18, 2015)
(J. ECF No. 42).
Plaintiff’s Motion [20] therefore is not well-taken.
Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that Plaintiff=s Motion [20] for Enjoinment is denied.
SO ORDERED this the 12th day of December, 2017.
s/ Robert H. Walker
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?