McGee v. Centurion Medical Services et al

Filing 22

ORDER denying 20 Motion for Enjoinment. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert H. Walker on 12/12/17. (RLW)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN DIVISION CHARLES L. MCGEE, #L7157 PLAINTIFF VERSUS CIVIL ACTION NO. CENTURION MEDICAL SERVICES, et al. 1:17-cv-224-LG-RHW DEFENDANTS ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION [20] FOR ENJOINMENT This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion [20] entitled “Motion for Enjoinment.” Plaintiff is requesting “this Honorable Court [] consider the enjoinment of all issues in civil action McGee v. Krebs[,] 1:15-cv-65-LG-RHW into civil action McGee v. Centurion[,] 1:17-cv-224-LG-RHW.” Pl.’ s Mot. [20] at 1. As discussed below, Plaintiff’s Motion [20] will be denied. A review of McGee v. Krebs, et al., No. 1:15-cv-65-LG-RHW (S.D. Miss Nov. 18, 2015), reveals that civil action is no longer pending. A Final Judgment was entered on November 18, 2015, dismissing the habeas claims without prejudice and dismissing the § 1983 claims as frivolous, for failure to state a claim, and dismissing certain Defendants as being immune from liability. See McGee v. Krebs, et al., No. 1:15-cv-65-LG-RHW (S.D. Miss Nov. 18, 2015) (J. ECF No. 42). Plaintiff’s Motion [20] therefore is not well-taken. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Plaintiff=s Motion [20] for Enjoinment is denied. SO ORDERED this the 12th day of December, 2017. s/ Robert H. Walker UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?