Southern Industrial Contractors, LLC v. Neel-Schaffer, Inc. et al
Filing
240
ORDER granting 199 Motion to Defer Motion for Summary Judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(d). Southern Industrial shall conduct the 30(b)(6) deposition of QES on or before April 30, 2018, and Southern Industrial's response to the 194 Motion for Summary Judgment is due on or before May 31, 2018. Signed by District Judge Louis Guirola, Jr., on 4/11/2018. (BR)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
SOUTHERN DIVISION
SOUTHERN INDUSTRIAL
CONTRACTORS, LLC
v.
PLAINTIFF
CAUSE NO. 1:17CV255-LG-JCG
NEEL-SCHAFFER, INC.; T.L.
WALLACE CONSTRUCTION, INC.;
THOMPSON ENGINEERING, INC.;
CH2M HILL, INC.; W.G. YATES &
SONS CONSTRUCTION
COMPANY; ROY ANDERSON
CORP.; YATES ANDERSON, JV;
QUALITY ENGINEERING
SERVICES, INC.; and MISSISSIPPI
DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
DEFENDANTS
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO DEFER MOTION
FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P.
56(d) WITH REQUEST FOR EXPEDITED CONSIDERATION
BEFORE THE COURT is the [199] Motion to Defer Motion for Summary
Judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(d) with Request for Expedited
Consideration filed by the plaintiff Southern Industrial Contractors, LLC. Southern
Industrial seeks a stay of this Court’s ruling on the [194] Motion for Summary
Judgment filed by the defendant Quality Engineering Services, Inc. (“QES”), so that
it can conduct a 30(b)(6) deposition of QES prior to filing a response to the Motion
for Summary Judgment. QES filed a response in opposition to the Rule 56(d)
Motion, but Southern Industrial did not file a reply. For the following reasons, the
Court finds that Southern Industrial’s Rule 56(d) Motion should be granted.
Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(d) provides that:
[i]f a nonmovant shows by affidavit or declaration that, for specified
reasons, it cannot present facts essential to justify its opposition, the
court may:
(1) defer considering the motion or deny it;
(2) allow time to obtain affidavits or declarations or to take discovery;
or
(3) issue any other appropriate order.
The Fifth Circuit has held that “Rule 56(d) motions for additional discovery are
broadly favored and should be liberally granted.” Smith v. Reg’l Transit Auth., 827
F.3d 412, 422 (5th Cir. 2016). To obtain a Rule 56(d) stay, the movant must (1)
demonstrate “how additional discovery will create a genuine issue of material fact;”
(2) “set forth a plausible basis for believing that specified facts, susceptible of
collection within a reasonable time frame, probably exist and indicate how
emergent facts, if adduced, will influence the outcome of the pending summary
judgment motion;” and (3) demonstrate that it has “diligently pursued discovery.”
Id.; McKay v. Novartis Pharm. Corp., 751 F.3d 694, 700 (5th Cir. 2014).
In its Motion, supporting Memorandum, and exhibits, Southern Industrial
has demonstrated that it should be permitted to conduct a 30(b)(6) deposition of
QES. First, in its Motion for Summary Judgment, QES relies in part on testimony
given by its president. Furthermore, counsel for Southern Industrial has given a
comprehensive list of information that he intends to gather at the proposed 30(b)(6)
deposition that, in his opinion, would create a genuine issue of material fact. In
addition, the discovery that Southern Industrial seeks is limited to one deposition.
Finally, Southern Industrial has been diligent in pursuing discovery. As a result,
Southern Industrial has demonstrated that this Court should defer its ruling on the
-2-
Motion for Summary Judgment filed by QES. Southern Industrial shall conduct the
30(b)(6) deposition of QES on or before April 30, 2018, and Southern Industrial’s
response to the Motion for Summary Judgment is due on or before May 31, 2018.
QES will be permitted to file a reply in support of its Motion according to the Local
Rules.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the [199] Motion
to Defer Motion for Summary Judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(d) with
Request for Expedited Consideration filed by the plaintiff Southern Industrial
Contractors, LLC, is GRANTED. Southern Industrial shall conduct the 30(b)(6)
deposition of QES on or before April 30, 2018, and Southern Industrial’s response to
the Motion for Summary Judgment is due on or before May 31, 2018.
SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED this the 11th day of April, 2018.
s/
Louis Guirola, Jr.
Louis Guirola, Jr.
United States District Judge
-3-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?