Anderson v. Jenkins
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 10 Report and Recommendations. Signed by District Judge Louis Guirola, Jr on 11/17/20. (JCH)
Case 1:17-cv-00284-LG-LRA Document 11 Filed 11/17/20 Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
CLARENCE DeJUAN ANDERSON
CAUSE NO. 1:17-cv-284-LG-LRA
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
BEFORE THE COURT is the  Report and Recommendation entered by
United States Magistrate Judge Linda R. Anderson on October 19, 2020. Judge
Anderson recommends that the  Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by
plaintiff, Clarence DeJuan Anderson, should be denied. Petitioner has not filed an
objection to the Report and Recommendation and the time for filing an objection has
Where no party has objected to the Magistrate Judge’s report and
recommendation, the Court need not conduct a de novo review of it. See 28 U.S.C. §
636(b)(1) (“A judge of the court shall make a de novo determination of those portions
of the report or specified proposed findings and recommendations to which objection
is made.”). In such cases, the Court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear
error on the face of the record. Douglass v. United Serv. Auto Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415,
1420 (5th Cir. 1996). Having conducted the required review, the Court finds that
Judge Anderson’s Report and Recommendation is neither clearly erroneous nor
contrary to law. Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is denied.
Case 1:17-cv-00284-LG-LRA Document 11 Filed 11/17/20 Page 2 of 2
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the  Report
and Recommendation entered by United States Magistrate Judge Linda R.
Anderson is ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court. Clarence DeJuan Anderson’s
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED AND DISMISSED WITH
SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED this the 17th day of November, 2020.
Louis Guirola, Jr.
LOUIS GUIROLA, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?