Willingham v. Harrison County
Filing
12
FINAL JUDGMENT: Ordered that Willingham's 1983 civil action is dismissed with prejudice and the habeas claims are dismissed without prejudice for this Court's lack of jurisdiction. Ordered that this dismissal counts as a "strike". Signed by District Judge Louis Guirola, Jr on 6/19/18. (JCH)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
SOUTHERN DIVISION
DONOVAN JAMAL WILLINGHAM, #171494
v.
PLAINTIFF
CAUSE NO. 1:17-cv-333-LG-RHW
HARRISON COUNTY
DEFENDANT
FINAL JUDGMENT
This matter is before the Court sua sponte. The Court, after a full review
and consideration of the record in this case and relevant legal authorities, finds that
in accord with its Memorandum Opinion and Order Dismissing Plaintiff’s
Complaint entered herewith,
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED, that Willingham’s
§ 1983 civil action is dismissed with prejudice until the Heck conditions are met, on
grounds that the § 1983 claims are legally frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915 (e)(2)(B)(i), and Willingham’s habeas claims are dismissed without prejudice
for this Court’s lack of jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(A).
IT IS, FURTHER, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED, that this dismissal
counts as a “strike” under the Prison Litigation Reform Act. See 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(g).
SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED this the 19th day of June, 2018.
s/
Louis Guirola, Jr.
LOUIS GUIROLA, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?