Willingham v. Harrison County

Filing 12

FINAL JUDGMENT: Ordered that Willingham's 1983 civil action is dismissed with prejudice and the habeas claims are dismissed without prejudice for this Court's lack of jurisdiction. Ordered that this dismissal counts as a "strike". Signed by District Judge Louis Guirola, Jr on 6/19/18. (JCH)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN DIVISION DONOVAN JAMAL WILLINGHAM, #171494 v. PLAINTIFF CAUSE NO. 1:17-cv-333-LG-RHW HARRISON COUNTY DEFENDANT FINAL JUDGMENT This matter is before the Court sua sponte. The Court, after a full review and consideration of the record in this case and relevant legal authorities, finds that in accord with its Memorandum Opinion and Order Dismissing Plaintiff’s Complaint entered herewith, IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED, that Willingham’s § 1983 civil action is dismissed with prejudice until the Heck conditions are met, on grounds that the § 1983 claims are legally frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (e)(2)(B)(i), and Willingham’s habeas claims are dismissed without prejudice for this Court’s lack of jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(A). IT IS, FURTHER, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED, that this dismissal counts as a “strike” under the Prison Litigation Reform Act. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED this the 19th day of June, 2018. s/ Louis Guirola, Jr. LOUIS GUIROLA, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?