Brink v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 13

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS, re: 12 Report and Recommendations. Signed by District Judge Louis Guirola, Jr on 6/24/19 (PKS)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN DIVISION JASON K. BRINK v. PLAINTIFF CAUSE NO. 1:18CV65-LG-MTP COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY DEFENDANT ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION BEFORE THE COURT is the [12] Report and Recommendation entered by United States Magistrate Judge Michael T. Parker. Judge Parker recommends that the Commissioner of Social Security’s final decision should be affirmed. Jarrell has not filed an objection to the Report and Recommendation. Where no party has objected to the Magistrate Judge=s report and recommendation, the Court need not conduct a de novo review of it. See 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1) (AA judge of the court shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings and recommendations to which objection is made.@) In such cases, the Court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record. Douglass v. United Serv. Auto Ass=n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1420 (5th Cir. 1996). Having conducted the required review, the Court finds that Judge Parker’s Report and Recommendation is neither clearly erroneous nor contrary to law. Therefore, the Report and Recommendation is adopted as the opinion of this Court. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the [12] Report and Recommendation entered by United States Magistrate Judge Michael T. Parker is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. The Commissioner’s decision is AFFIRMED. The Court will enter a separate judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58. SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED this the 24th day of June, 2019. s/ Louis Guirola, Jr. LOUIS GUIROLA, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?