Brink v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
13
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS, re: 12 Report and Recommendations. Signed by District Judge Louis Guirola, Jr on 6/24/19 (PKS)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
SOUTHERN DIVISION
JASON K. BRINK
v.
PLAINTIFF
CAUSE NO. 1:18CV65-LG-MTP
COMMISSIONER OF
SOCIAL SECURITY
DEFENDANT
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
BEFORE THE COURT is the [12] Report and Recommendation entered by
United States Magistrate Judge Michael T. Parker. Judge Parker recommends that
the Commissioner of Social Security’s final decision should be affirmed. Jarrell has
not filed an objection to the Report and Recommendation.
Where no party has objected to the Magistrate Judge=s report and
recommendation, the Court need not conduct a de novo review of it. See 28 U.S.C. '
636(b)(1) (AA judge of the court shall make a de novo determination of those portions
of the report or specified proposed findings and recommendations to which objection
is made.@) In such cases, the Court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear
error on the face of the record. Douglass v. United Serv. Auto Ass=n, 79 F.3d 1415,
1420 (5th Cir. 1996).
Having conducted the required review, the Court finds that Judge Parker’s
Report and Recommendation is neither clearly erroneous nor contrary to law.
Therefore, the Report and Recommendation is adopted as the opinion of this Court.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the [12] Report
and Recommendation entered by United States Magistrate Judge Michael T. Parker
is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. The Commissioner’s decision is
AFFIRMED. The Court will enter a separate judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P.
58.
SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED this the 24th day of June, 2019.
s/
Louis Guirola, Jr.
LOUIS GUIROLA, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?