Davis v. Harrison County Second Judicial District
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 9 Report and Recommendations as the opinion of this Court. This lawsuit is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by District Judge Louis Guirola, Jr. on 3/31/21. (RLW)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
CAUSE NO. 1:19CV962-LG-RPM
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
BEFORE THE COURT are the  Report and Recommendations entered in
this matter by Magistrate Judge Robert P. Myers, Jr. on March 9, 2021. This
lawsuit involves allegations by pro se Plaintiff Nigellus Devonte Davis that he “was
true billed since 2014 and prison held 8 times.” (Compl., 3, ECF No. 1). After
conducting an Omnibus hearing which Plaintiff did not attend, Judge Myers
recommended that the instant lawsuit be dismissed without prejudice for failure to
prosecute. A copy of the Report and Recommendations was mailed to Plaintiff, but
he did not timely file objections.
Where no party has objected to the Magistrate Judge’s report and
recommendation, the Court need not conduct a de novo review of it. See 28 U.S.C. §
636(b)(1) (“A judge of the court shall make a de novo determination of those portions
of the report or specified proposed findings and recommendations to which objection
is made.”). In such cases, the Court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear
error on the face of the record. Douglass v. United Serv. Auto Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415,
1420 (5th Cir. 1996). Having conducted the required review, the Court finds that
Judge Myers’s Report and Recommendations are neither clearly erroneous nor
contrary to law.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the  Report
and Recommendations are ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. This lawsuit is
DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED this the 31st day of March, 2021.
Louis Guirola, Jr.
LOUIS GUIROLA, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?