Orris v. Capital One Bank (USA), N.A. et al
AGREED JUDGMENT DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE. Civil action is dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the settlement agreement entered by the parties. Signed by District Judge Halil S. Ozerden on 9/10/2020 (PKS)
Case 1:20-cv-00058-HSO-JCG Document 12 Filed 09/10/20 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES,
CIVIL CASE NO: 1:20-cv-00058-HSO-JCG
AGREED JUDGMENT DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE
AND RETAINING JURISDICTION TO ENFORCE SETTLEMENT
THIS DAY THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the joint motion, ore tenus, of all parties to
dismiss this action with prejudice and to retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the settlement
agreement. The Court has been advised by the parties that this cause has been fully compromised
and settled, that there remain no issues to be litigated by or between the parties nor adjudicated
and determined by the Court, and that the parties have consented to the entry of this Judgment and
have agreed that this cause should be dismissed with prejudice with the parties to bear their
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the above captioned civil
action is dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Court shall retain jurisdiction
over this action to enforce the terms of the settlement agreement entered by the parties.
SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED this the 10th day of September 2020.
s/ Halil Suleyman Ozerden
HALIL SULEYMAN OZERDEN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?