Gulf Restoration Network v. City of Hattiesburg

Filing 103

ORDER denying 98 Motion to Strike. If Plaintiff wishes to file a sur-reply in response to the arguments allegedly raised for the first time in reply, it may do so on or before March 27, 2017. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on 3/20/2017 (dtj)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
EASTERN DIVISION
GULF RESTORATION NETWORK
v.

PLAINTIFF
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:12-CV-36-KS-MTP

CITY OF HATTIESBURG

DEFENDANT

ORDER
The Court denies Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike [98] Defendant’s reply in support
of its Motion to Terminate the Amended Consent Judgment [90]. However, if Plaintiff
wishes to file a sur-reply in response to the arguments allegedly raised for the first
time in reply, it may do so on or before March 27, 2017.
SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED this

20th day of

March , 2017.

s/Keith Starrett
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE