Jackson v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
17
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of Magistrate Judge Michael T. Parker denying Plaintiff's Motion to Reverse the Commissioner's Decision and granting Defendant's Motion to Affirm Commissioner's Decision. A separate Judgment shall be entered. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on June 26, 2014 (dsl)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
EASTERN DIVISION
ALBERT EARL JACKSON
VS.
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:13cv127-KS-MTP
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
This cause came on this date to be heard upon the Report and Recommendation
of the United States Magistrate Judge entered herein on May 28, 2014, after referral of
hearing by this Court. On June 19, 2014, Plaintiff Albert L. Jackson, by and through his
attorney, notified the Court [16] that he would file no objection to the Report and
Recommendation, electing to file another and separate application for Title II benefits
with the Social Security Administration. Having reviewed fully the Report and
Recommendation, as well as the record in this matter and being fully advised in the
premises, the Court finds that said Report and Recommendation should be adopted as
the opinion of this Court.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation be, and
the same hereby is, adopted as the finding of this Court, and that Plaintiff’s Motion to
Reverse the Commissioner’s decision [6] is denied. The Motion for Order Affirming the
decision of the Commissioner [9] is granted and the Commissioner’s decision is
affirmed. The Complaint filed herein is dismissed and benefits are denied. A separate
judgment will be entered herein in accordance with this Order as required by Rule 58 of
the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
SO ORDERED, this the 26th day of June, 2014.
s/Keith Starrett
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?