Bullock v. Colvin

Filing 15

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of Magistrate Judge F. Keith Ball reversing the Commissioner's decision and remanding the case for further proceedings. A separate Judgment shall be filed. Signed by District Judge Daniel P. Jordan, III on February 13, 2015. (DM)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI EASTERN DIVISION MYRON J. BULLOCK PLAINTIFF V. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:14CV12 DPJ-FKB CAROLYN W. COLVIN, ACTING COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION DEFENDANT ORDER This cause came on this date to be heard upon the Report and Recommendation [8] of the United States Magistrate Judge, after referral of hearing by this Court. Magistrate Judge F. Keith Ball found that the Commissioner’s decision is not supported by substantial evidence and recommended that the decision be reversed and the matter remanded for further proceedings. The Court has been advised that both the Commissioner and Plaintiff do not intend to file Objections to the Report and Recommendation. The Court, having fully reviewed the unopposed Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge entered in this cause, and being duly advised in the premises, finds that said Report and Recommendation should be adopted. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation [8] of United States Magistrate Judge F. Keith Ball be, and the same is hereby, adopted as the finding of this Court. The Commissioner’s motion to affirm the decision [10] is denied; the decision of the Commissioner is reversed; and the case is remanded for further proceedings. A separate judgment will be entered herein in accordance with the Order as required by Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED this the 13th day of February, 2015. s/ Daniel P. Jordan III UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?