Walker et al v. Target Corporation
Filing
92
ORDER. Plaintiff shall respond to Motions 77 , 78 , 81 , 83 , 85 and 90 on or before May 4, 2017. Defendant wants to reply, it must do so within seven days of the filing of Plaintiff's responses, but no later than May 11, 2017. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on 4/21/2017 (dtj)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
EASTERN DIVISION
DR. DEBRA L. WALKER, et al.
V.
PLAINTIFFS
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:16-CV-42-KS-MTP
TARGET CORPORATION
DEFENDANT
ORDER
On April 20, 2017, Defendant filed the following motions: Motion to Strike [77]
Plaintiff’s Supplemental Interrogatory Responses; Motion for Summary Judgment [78]
as to Liability; Motion to Exclude [81] Certain Testimony by Plaintiff’s Experts Lacy
Sapp and George Carter; Motion to Exclude [83] Plaintiff’s Expert Chris Herring;
Motion for Partial Summary Judgment [85] as to Certain Damages and Medical
Causation; and Motion to Exclude [90] Certain Testimony by Plaintiff’s Expert Stephen
Lambert. Plaintiff shall respond to the motions on or before May 4, 2017. L.U.Civ.R.
7(b)(4); FED. R. CIV. P. 6(a). If Defendant wants to reply, it must do so within seven
days of the filing of Plaintiff’s responses, but no later than May 11, 2017. L.U.Civ.R.
7(b)(4); FED. R. CIV. P. 6(a).
If any party wants an extension of time, it must file a motion prior to the
deadline’s expiration. L.U.Civ.R. 7(b)(4). Any party seeking an extension must advise
the Court whether it is opposed. L.U.Civ.R. 7(b)(10).
Defendant’s original and reply memoranda shall not exceed a combined total of
thirty-five (35) pages per each motion, and Plaintiff’s responses shall not exceed thirtyfive (35) pages each. L.U.Civ.R. 7(b)(5). If any party wants to file extra pages, they
must seek leave to do so.
SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED, on this, the
21st day of April, 2016.
s/Keith Starrett
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?