Walker et al v. Target Corporation

Filing 92

ORDER. Plaintiff shall respond to Motions 77 , 78 , 81 , 83 , 85 and 90 on or before May 4, 2017. Defendant wants to reply, it must do so within seven days of the filing of Plaintiff's responses, but no later than May 11, 2017. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on 4/21/2017 (dtj)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI EASTERN DIVISION DR. DEBRA L. WALKER, et al. V. PLAINTIFFS CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:16-CV-42-KS-MTP TARGET CORPORATION DEFENDANT ORDER On April 20, 2017, Defendant filed the following motions: Motion to Strike [77] Plaintiff’s Supplemental Interrogatory Responses; Motion for Summary Judgment [78] as to Liability; Motion to Exclude [81] Certain Testimony by Plaintiff’s Experts Lacy Sapp and George Carter; Motion to Exclude [83] Plaintiff’s Expert Chris Herring; Motion for Partial Summary Judgment [85] as to Certain Damages and Medical Causation; and Motion to Exclude [90] Certain Testimony by Plaintiff’s Expert Stephen Lambert. Plaintiff shall respond to the motions on or before May 4, 2017. L.U.Civ.R. 7(b)(4); FED. R. CIV. P. 6(a). If Defendant wants to reply, it must do so within seven days of the filing of Plaintiff’s responses, but no later than May 11, 2017. L.U.Civ.R. 7(b)(4); FED. R. CIV. P. 6(a). If any party wants an extension of time, it must file a motion prior to the deadline’s expiration. L.U.Civ.R. 7(b)(4). Any party seeking an extension must advise the Court whether it is opposed. L.U.Civ.R. 7(b)(10). Defendant’s original and reply memoranda shall not exceed a combined total of thirty-five (35) pages per each motion, and Plaintiff’s responses shall not exceed thirtyfive (35) pages each. L.U.Civ.R. 7(b)(5). If any party wants to file extra pages, they must seek leave to do so. SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED, on this, the 21st day of April, 2016. s/Keith Starrett UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?