Clark v. Herrington et al
ORDER. Plaintiff has until on or before February 21, 2017 to respond to 35 Motion to Dismiss on Qualified Immunity. If Movants wish to file a rebuttal they may do so on or before February 28, 2017. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on 2/8/2017 (dtj)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
KAYLA CLARK, ADMINISTRATRIX
AND ON BEHALF OF ALL HEIRS AT
LAW AND WRONGFUL DEATH
BENEFICIARIES OF JONATHAN
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:16-CV-101-KS-MTP
KEVIN HERRINGTON et al.
On February 7, 2017, Defendants (“Movants”) filed their Motion to Dismiss Based on
Qualified Immunity . Plaintiff (“Respondent”) has until on or before February 21, 2017, to
respond to this motion. Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(a), (d); L.U.Civ.R. 7(b)(4). If Movants wish to file a
rebuttal, they may do so on or before February 28, 2017. Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(a), (d); L.U.Civ.R.
If either Movants or Respondent require an extension of time, they must file a motion for
such prior to the deadline’s expiration. L.U.Civ.R. 7(b)(4). Any party seeking an extension must
advise the Court whether it is opposed. L.U.Civ.R. 7(b)(10).
Movants’ original and reply memoranda shall not exceed a combined total of thirty-five
(35) pages, and Respondent’s response shall not exceed thirty-five (35) pages. L.U.Civ.R. 7(b)(5).
If a party requires more pages to fully respond, they may seek leave to do file an excess of pages.
SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED, on this, the
day of February, 2017.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?